April 28, 2017

IQs of Indians

The median IQ for “Indians” has been notoriously difficult to pin down, largely because “Indian” is a fictitious race (and “India” is a fictitious country), but they exist today. So here we are, looking at the IQs of Indians in India, the UK and the United States.

For the IQs of Indians in India and the UK, I use Richard Lynn’s data, but did as much independent verification as I could, and Lynn’s numbers on Indians, to the extent I could check them, were totally verified in every instance. This was a lot of work, but it’s worth it to have peace of mind that these numbers are probably sound.

Richard Lynn is the only researcher I know of who does comprehensive global IQ estimates – he’s the only show in town for now, and so I mainly use his work as a starting point. These posts aren’t going away, and can be added to and modified.

IQs of Indians in India


The median IQ of Indians in the country of India is 82. The median IQ for the continent of India is 84.

The mean IQ of Indians in the country of India is 82.69, while the mean IQ for the continent of India is 82.87.

In 2009 two regions of India participated in the PISA tests. Their scores on reading, science and math together averaged 336. This translates to an IQ of 76, lower than all of the studies shown here.

IQs of Indians in Britain


The data from 2009 is sharply at odds with the older data. It comes from a test of schoolchildren using the “Cognitive Assessment Test”. The pre-2009 scores show an average of 90.42, while the results from the 2009 CAT scores is 95.17.

One can give a median number, but I don’t think it would be meaningful given the sharp jump. I’ll hedge my bets and estimate the IQs of Indians (from the subcontinent of India) living in the UK to be 93.

Indians in the United States

For Indians in the United States, I only know of two sources for estimates. One is some unpublished SAT data from 1990, which gives Indian SAT test takers an average score of 1029, which translates to an IQ of 110.84 compared to a white SAT of 934 which translates to an IQ of 103.96.

If the white IQ is set to 100 in this sample, then the Indian IQ would be 106.62

The other comes from a Forbes article which estimates the IQ of Indian children of 112 based on a backwards digit-span test.

I don’t have a good estimate, but I would guess that the average Indian IQ in the US is 106, just rounding down from the SAT number because they probably do more SAT test prep than whites.

As I said before, “Indian” IQ is very difficult to get a firm grasp on, and it appears that “Indian” probably has several IQ medians because in reality it’s multiple “races”, or at least genetically identifiable groups with their own median IQs.

Sources for Indians in India:

Chopra 1966:

http://www.tandfonline.com.sci-hub.io/doi/pdf/10.1080/00224545.1966.9712407

Sinha 1968, Rao and Reddy 1968, Raven 1996 independent citation:

http://arthurjensen.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Helmuth-Nyborg-The-Scientific-Study-of-General-Intelligence-FIXED-2003.pdf

Majumdar and Nundi 1971:

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1974-10149-001

Mohanty and Babu 1983:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239801334_Bilingualism_and_Metalinguistic_Ability_among_Kond_Tribals_in_Orissa_India

Agrawal 1984:

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01068128

Afzal 1988:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/19964938_Consquences_of_consanguinity_on_cognitive_behavior

Alvi 1986:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/00207598608247612/abstract

India’s PISA Score:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment

Sources for Indians in the United Kingdom:

ILEA 1967:

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED059336.pdf

Black People’s Association 1978:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz-9hs_TdzGPdHVFV0xkUFplQ1E/view

Scarr 1983:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1983.tb00542.x/abstract

Mackintosh et. al. 1985 indepdendent citation:

http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1392640.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

West et. al. 1992:

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1639080

2009 CAT scores:

/lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/glassessment.pdf

Sources for Indians in the United States:

Arthur Hu’s data religion and SAT score:

http://www.arthurhu.com/index/relig.htm

Old-form SAT to IQ conversion:

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/satiq.aspx

Forbes Article on Indian IQ in the United States:

http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-indian-americans-opinions-contributors_immigrants_minority.html

Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn:

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/lynn-race-differences-in-intelligence.pdf

Facebook Comments
  • Aron Deon

    Haha. Richard Lynn is known to contrive his studies. As in the case of Nigerians where he published two lowest results for Nigeria, India or other nations will follow the same trend.
    Source: http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/khan-2015.pdf
    Average IQ in Lucknow: 110, 429 children.
    Source: http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/singh-2013.pdf
    Average IQ: 90+, 42 children
    Source: http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-20124.pdf
    Average IQ: 97, 100 children
    Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-2007.pdf
    Average IQ: 104, 194 children

    I can cite hundreds of articles where average IQ of China is less than 85 and average IQ of India is higher than 100. Challenge me and I will show. Why don’t you include those articles.

    You want “hyper-large sample sizes” for IQ comparisons ?
    http://poetsandquants.com/2014/01/04/why-53-countries-beat-the-u-s-on-the-gmat/
    Average GMAT score:-
    USA: 533, India: 577, China: 581 (despite poor english proficiency of Indians and Chinese). And these are Indians in India and Chinese in China.
    Sample size:- 119,000 for USA. 30,000 per year for India and China.

    And results are consistent for past 20 years.
    total sample size (GMAT) in india v/s china v/s usa: 20 million plus (far higher than your negligible IQ tests, PISA test data-sets).

    Indians are out-preparing for SAT. I can say the same thing about Chinese or others. People will laugh at you if you tell them that Indians out-prepare Chinese for any school or SAT tests.

    Best way to compare intelligence is by checking the limit. Anyone of any race can outscore someone from other race. Like how even Indian athletes can run 100 m races in 11 sec, but Black athletes can run faster in 10 sec as they are genetically stronger. To check the genes, you have to compare all ethnicities in such competitions with high limits. International Maths Olympiad:-
    Past 2 years, USA is winning maths olympiad. US olympiad team:-
    https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2016
    https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2015

    There are 3 Indians, 3 Chinese, 1 Indian-Chinese mixed, 2 whites in USA maths olympiad teams.
    Population size in USA:- 200 million whites, 3 million Indians, 4.5 million Chinese. (100x over-representation).

    Clearly Asians (Indians and Chinese) are genetically smarter than whites, evident in GMAT scores for each nation; etc.

    If you think Indians in USA out-prepare for maths olympiads, I want to tell you that 3 million Indians cannot outprepare 200 million whites.

    • Meeple

      I see. Indians are so smart they are still crapping in the open. Nothing is really indicating IQ of 100 yet somehow China should be collapsing by your data and South Korea and Japan should have long turned Latin America. Something doesn’t smell right here. No pun intended.

      You can certainly argue the Brahmans are smart but to say India has an average of 100 according to fluoride studies is just a tad bit silly.

      • Aron Deon

        Fluoride studies show an IQ above 100 in many regions of India. It is not an estimate, but the results of IQ tests. I am not saying that India has average IQ of 100. I am just pointing out high Iq studies in India which seems to be missing in authors article who has clearly cherry picked lowest scoring IQ samples in India.

        I am not claiming that China has very low IQ as well. The IQ data-set of China shows large variation from 75-115 on average IQ results. Average Chinese IQ is unknown and what is shown by Lynn are results of just a few studies.

        Why is Indian GMAT score at par with China, far higher than USA by 8 IQ points.
        Only the Brahmans take the test ? Let me tell you that 35 percent of Indian students take GMAT test and at the worst case, GMAT scores for India show us that 20 percentile of India has IQ of 108+.

        Same is evident in TIMMS results. Read my answer to this question (https://www.quora.com/Why-is-India-a-low-IQ-society/answer/Aron-Deon).

        Now as you have tried to troll, let me tell you that “you should read before commenting”.

      • Aron Deon

        USA is crplapping without a water jet while saudi arabia uses one. Who has high IQ if crapping is the sole criteria ?

      • Aron Deon

        OK. Some easy stuff for you. Can you explain why East Asian researchers perform at par with Indian PhD students ?
        Here are the stats for you:
        http://www.scimagojr.com/count
        This is the number of research articles published out of each nation in international journals in 2015. Top 3 in Asia:-
        1. China: 416,000
        2. India: 123,000
        3. Japan: 109,000
        4. Korea: 73,000
        Nigeria: 5,000
        Vietnam: 4,092
        Vietnamese people (ethnically same as Chinese) perform worse than Nigeria. I will not compare any South East Asian nation as they are nowhere close to India (even adjusting for population sizes).
        Let me compare India v/s China v/s Japan:-
        Number of researchers per million (http://data.worldbank.org/indi
        India: 137, Japan: 5300, China: 1087.
        Even with 4x lower scientists than Japan (most of Indian scientists being selected for being lower caste and not merit), Indians have beaten the Japanese research foundation.
        And our scientists are 4-5x more efficient yhan chinese counterparts. As there is a joke in indian universities that “indians phds are more productive than chinese professors”. Even though china has 10x more people working, the high quality research output is higher among indians.
        Lastly, not only Brahmins or indian elites, even common average indian outperforms chinese (on average) located in Singapore, usa, uk, canada, malaysia, australia, hong kong and all those places. Number of people: 200 million plus. And gaps are big as well. Look at Australia. Average indian is earning 539/w while chinese is 239/w. Even Caucasian/african income gap is not that big in usa.
        So, atleast Indians do not buy that chinese iq crap as even our average citizens (if given same education as chinese) outperform chinese academically and socio economically.
        Lastly, i can show that chinese in malaysia score at par with czech republic on pisa, etc.

        • Jing Wei

          Chinese vastly outperforms Indians on the global level, Indian can only do better in English speaking countries, specifically the US. Not even in UK or Canada. Chinese come up with so many papers and patents comparing to India, there’s joke in China that Indian professor are only Chinese high school level. Indians are good at talking, given that their official language is English, that’s why they only can move up the management in English speaking countries serving foreign firms. While Chinese smartest start their own companies and beating Americans at their own games, Indian can only serve in foreign companies with minimal ability of starting Indian own successful companies. There’s a reason why just 3 IT companies in China, Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu has market valuation more than the entire Indian IT industry combined. That’s not even counting countless medium size companies. Why else would Indian with population on par with China has such little research papers published and with patents filed almost on par with Africa. We are talking about 1.2B population! A country where west is so eager to help and transfer so much technology over, yet it is still decades behind China in technology, while China is being treated as enemy by the west and high technology are banned from transferring. Yes, Indian IQ

          • Aron Deon

            BS again. Indians in Malaysia are 4x less population size than chinese. So stop putting false stats here.
            Malaysia:-
            Education: Indians constitute 15.5 percent of Malaysian professionals. This includes doctors (28.4%), lawyers (26.8%), dentists (21%), veterinary surgeons (28.5%), engineers (6.4%), accountants (5.8%), surveyors (3.0%) and architects (1.5%). Furthermore, Malaysian Indians make up 38% of the Malaysian medical workforce.
            Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysian_Indian

            Indians only make-up 7 percent of Malaysia’s population and are over-represented at law and medical schools compared to East Asians and Malays. This is the condition when there is 70 percent reservation for Bumiputras in Malaysian universities and only 30 percent of seats are available for 28 pc East Asians and 7 pc Indians.

            Incomes:
            https://www.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.static-economist.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Foriginal-size%2Fimages%2F2015%2F08%2Fblogs%2Fgraphic-detail%2F20150926_woc851_0.png&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fblogs%2Fgraphicdetail%2F2015%2F09%2Fmalaysia-graphics&docid=GdUt7P0D5GssUM&tbnid=vvHOOMoh55FceM%3A&w=580&h=598&bih=667&biw=1360&ved=0ahUKEwjSytqT0dnNAhWBRo8KHcFmDdUQMwgeKAMwAw&iact=mrc&uact=8
            Malay: 3200

            Indians: 2200

            Chinese: 1800

            So even in Malaysia, we are doing far better compared to population size. Wait I will show about Singapore, canada,australia and UK.

          • Jing Wei

            lol, Indian have no ability to create 1st world nation. when you take into account 100% indian and chinese, chinese make 6x wages than indians, chinese has 10x more billionaires, and have 10x more startups in the billion dollar range. Singapore, Hong Kong are all chinese societies, Indian have no abilities to create first world countries on their own and can elites can only immigrate to those first world chinese societies. So yes, higher iq chinese does beat lower iq indian on every single account. While Indians show only few millions that are doing better than the chinese. Chinese have shown billions more people who are better off than the Indians. Indian even with 100x more english speaking researchers, still trails chinese in research papers and patents. lol, lol.

          • Jing Wei

            East asian have astronomically higher nobel prize winners than south asian, ethnic chinese are significantly more than ethnic indians in noble prize winners. when counting 100% indians and 100% chinese in the world, chinese has 10x more billionaires, 6x more incomes, 10x more startups in billion dollar range than the Indians, the number is simply staggering, Indian with low iq are behind on so many levels. While Indian love to compare millions of Indians who are doing better than the chinese, Chinese have billions that are doing better than the Indians. High IQ Chinese created societies are first world, Indian majority countries are sub-sahara African like, that’s why Indians can only migrate to other English speaking countries and serve high iq whites and chinese/japanese created companies. There’s no Indian universities in the top 200, while chinese have over 10, including Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore, that’s over 30. Indian researches and science are just as backward as sub-sahara Africans, lol.

          • Aron Deon

            In Australia:-

            Incomes in Australia:-

            Chinese: 239 $ per week. Whites: 484 $ per week. Indians: 539 $ per week.

            http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3416.0Main+Features22008

            White/Australian aboriginal gap is less than indians/chinese gap in Australia. Low IQ is the only reason for chinese failure just like how indian scientists have astronomical high research output than east asians. All stats are above from science journals. Anything to prove your farted claims that chinese scientists have higher research output other than your crying and begging messages. Lol

      • Aron Deon

        If you can prove to me that indians living in hong kong (highest iq nation on the planet) are Brahmans even though they were soldiers in ww2, i will not discuss anything anymore

        • Jing Wei

          why Hong Kong a predominately Chinese city is a first world city, while Indian majority country are all sub-sahara African like places? That’s why it’s always ridiculous comparing Indian (predominantly college educated IT professionals) in US with all Americans which include dishwashers and toiler cleaners. If you compare top tier American, Chinese, Japanese with top tier Indians, Indians don’t stand a chance. Joke in China and Japan is that Indian professors are so bad that even Chinese or Japanese high school students are better. While whites, chinese and japanese build their own first world countries, few elite Indians can only emigrate to these top tier countries because Indian as a whole has no ability of building modern countries on their own, that’s why India is comparable to Sub-Sahara African countries in infrastructure, research, patents, and of course, IQ.

      • Aron Deon

        These are the places (singapore, malaysia and hong kong) where non upper caste of india outperforms chinese on average.
        Ofcourse i am not including usa, uk, Australia, canada and germany as obviously “indian brahmins are living there”.

        • Jing Wei

          that’s just not the right comparison, if you want compare, top tier Chinese in general vastly outperforms top tier Indians. It’s like saying Indian outperforms white in America, okay, so you comparing all the college graduated IT professional with all white people in America including dish washers, is that even a fair comparison? How about compare all of Indian in the world including dishwashers, toilet cleaner with all chinese in the world including dishwasher and toilet cleaner, that’s the only fair comparison, the answer will be simply, Chinese vastly outperforms Indians.

          • Aron Deon

            And the research stats also counta chinese and japanese journals. Or even comapre india to Singapore on average research output, a nation which speaks English much better and have best people from china working. Go compete with low iq nations first.
            With chinese being shoe makers in india and indians performing far better than chinese in Hong Kong and Singapore despite being not selected for intelligence, only a drunkyard will believe you.
            And by the way, inter race intelligence gaps are very minute and negligible. So if chinese in india are shoe makers (outperforming their intellectual capabilities though via hard work and physical strength), 90 pc chinese will have same potential as Chinese in india. Also confirmed by indians in Hong kong.
            You don’t believe in psychometrics ? You must be ignrant or a fool.

          • Jing Wei

            lol, 99% of the world knows indian have signficnatly lower iq than the chinese. That’s why chinese create first world cities and countries, and indians majority countries and cities are sub-sahara african like. Indian has no universities in the top 200, while china has over 10. Indian research are just as backward as sub-sahara africans. while china, singapore, thailand, philippine, malaysia have billionaires that are practcially all chinese, you can hardly find any indians. Again, east asian including chinese and japanese have astronomically more nobels prize winner than south asian including indians. when you count 100% indian and chinese in the world, chinese beat indian hands down. That’s why china comes up with 10X more research papers and patents than indians despite limited english ability when filing internationally. the high IQ explains why chinese has 10x more billionaires, 6x wages, 10x more startups in billion dollar range than the Indians, the number is staggering when you comparing 100% chinese vs. 100% indians.

          • Aron Deon

            Well, indians outperforming whites in USA is not because they are college educated. Most of the gaps arw due to second generation educational status. Just like Uk where indians have way higher test scores, USA has same trends.
            Why compare indians in usa with whites anyways.
            http://poetsandquants.com/2014/01/04/why-53-countries-beat-the-u-s-on-the-gmat/

            National GMAT score:-
            India: 577, China: 581, USA: 533.
            SAT and GRE have thw same trends. It is scientifically proven that all these exams cover 50-60 pc Indian population uniformly and randomly.
            Lastly, there is famed farted arguments given by chinese and whites that indians outprepare for SAT, GMAT , etc.
            It is baseless. PISA scores on india are available. Not even a single kid out of 100,000 could calculate area of triangle using Pythagoras theorm. Yet indian SAT scores are higher than whites.
            The only reason they cover up all the educational deficit in just 3 years, from not even knowing Pythagoras theorm at 15 year of age and having kowest PISA scores to having highest SAT scores is due to superior intelligence.

            Your education where kids spend 5 hrs per day extra in schools isn’t sufficient to outscore indians on SAT, etc even on maths primarily due to low intelligence in east asian race consistent with the fact that east asians are shoe makers in india, even though you have significant advantage at 15 year old level in PISA where there is no comparison.
            So, it is clear that indians are far superior than east asians. Intelligence is all about gathering knowledge and applying it. Despite not knowing anything by the time indians give pisa, 3 years of schooling with educational time being 4 hrs per day less in schools puts them at par with chinamen. Clearly implying superior intelligence.
            As they say, hard work doesn’t pay off.

            And there is negligible intelligence gap among two people of same race. So their is no such thing that there are top tier indians or low tier indians. Most indians have similar intelligence level.

          • Jing Wei

            yet, indian still have no intelligence of creating high iq first world societies on their own, the first tier first world countries cities where indians living in are all created by high iq whites and the chinese. you don’t have universities in the top 200, while china has over 10. East asian have astronomically higher nobel prize winners than south asian, ethnic chinese are significantly more than ethnic indians in noble prize winners. when counting 100% indians and 100% chinese in the world, chinese has 10x more billionaires, 6x more incomes, 10x more startups in billion dollar range than the Indians, the number is simply staggering, Indian with low iq are behind on so many levels. While Indian love to compare millions of Indians who are doing better than the chinese, Chinese have billions that are doing better than the Indians.

          • Aron Deon

            Indian ancient civilization is considered to be far superior to Chinese even by the Chinese historians. Chinese haven’t created first world societies on their own. It is based on copied technology from west. If left alone, they would still be using caveman scripts. Having said that, india is a first world nation on science and technology. Below in the comments you will find research stats from India,china and Japan. Number of international publications in English, Chinese and Japanese journals. Number of people working.
            There is simply no comparison with your people. As research output is correlated to human intelligence, it isn’t a surprise that Indians do far better.

            Indeed the country of China has an average IQ of 76 v/s 104 for India. You want proof:-

            Average IQ of China:-

            http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-

            I hope that you read this article. Average IQ reported in Shandong Province of China is 76 and 81 (non-flurosis and fluorisis region)…. More
            EditReply
            Sep 29
            Aron Deon
            Aron Deon
            Or even bigger insult will be Kolkata. 100 million Indians living abraod are considered smart migration by trolls, even if they are construction workers kind of immigrants.

            Chinese expats living in India:-
            Kolkata’s Chinese live in stateless sorrow
            Quotes:… More
            EditReply
            Oct 30
            Ashwani Sharma
            Ashwani Sharma
            3 votes
            Hmmm. Here is a study showing the median income of Asian immigrants in USA.

            Asian-Americans Lead All Others in Household Income

            As you can see.

            India ($88,000) >>> China ($65,050) >>> Korea ($50,000)… More
            ReplyUpvotedDownvote
            Aug 6
            Aron Deon: I think you can generalize by sa… and 2 others
            Michael Moldenhauer
            Michael Moldenhauer
            1 vote
            So are you saying that the lack of good “IQ” in India is due to primarily genetics, which are unchangeable? That they just never “evolved”?! If that’s so, does that mean you are saying India will never be able to have a future as a developed, advanced country, will always be poor and a laggard, because it just doesn’t have enough “IQ Genetics” — and if so, then do you suggest it should just th… More
            ReplyUpvoteDownvote
            Mar 30
            Aron Deon
            Aron Deon
            5 votes
            No Indians do not have lower IQ. IQ testing does not measure verbal skills as it is non-verbal test of intelligence. Indians outperform the whole world on verbal SATs (Europe, China, etc.). Go to USA and Indians are doing at par with Ashkenazi Jews on household salaries and research. While Chinese are unable to do that.

            Picture puzzle based IQ testing based comparison (which is heavily biased on visualization strength) has to be put aside as it does not measure verbal strength and mathematical aptitude.

            Even people who are considered “untouchables in India” outperform East Asians on language skills in Singaporean schools and have higher success in Singapore world than East Asians. Household salaries in Singapore gives a proof.

            Check US salaries by ethnicity. It is Jews followed by Indians. And high quality patenting done in US also have the same trend. While Indians in US have only reported 90 IQ as per Raven’s test but they are finding Jewish people as mentally retarded. So, Indians have high verbal strength unmeasured by Raven’s test.

            East Asia’s failure in producing high quality researchers:-

            Comparison between India, China and Western world on top researchers:-

            ……………….RnD(billions)…….#top researchers…..#universities……School enrol

            EU+US:……807…………………….60………………….. 8000……………1 billion
            East Asia:….605……………………..16………………………..4000…………….1.5 billion
            India:…………47………………………11………………………..700………………300 million

            Source for top 100 researchers: “Microsoft Academia website”.

            Entire East Asia (Japan, Korea, China) is finding it hard to compete with India in producing top quality researchers despite having 13x bigger research budget, 4-5x more school enrollment, etc.

      • Aron Deon

        And i am not saying that indians have iq above 100. I am just pointing out to research articles where india scored above 100. Clearly, the author has only selected low iq studies in india.
        I also never claimed that chinese iq is less than 85.

        • Meeple

          Lol okay if I can put it this way. Aron is a non Brahman butt hurt person that identifies himself as Indian. He is shocked to find articles like this that come to the conclusion that India is only a few points above sub Saharan Africa and set out on a ‘scientific’ quest to prove the article wrong. Always a good start to start with a conclusion and cherry pick your data to support your ego.

          So out of all the cherry picked data, the only conclusion we can objectively come to is some Indians are smarter than some Chinese. Not sure if you really needed any studies to prove this.

          The irony is that Aron completely ignores the fact that Indian as a race doesn’t exist so what we are talking about is average IQ for the

          • Aron Deon

            Well. I am doing the same thing what the writer of this post is doing. As he is cherry picking low scoring samples (on tribals and muslims in orissa and bihar, not even on average population, lol, 10x higher selection bias than my data), i am cherry picking high scoring samples.
            Its called “showing contradictive data”.

            Anyways, i don’t need to see research articles.
            Best iq study on indian population (with no selection bias and including all school kids) is the timms report. Even our poorest regions show 85 iq. Even though indians spend 4 hrs less than chinese and 2 hrs less than europe in schools and malnourishment is 50 pc which brings iq by 20 points.
            As mentioned by lynn, long term iq potential for india is 100. As your ampute subspecies brain was unable to understand my post, i hope that Lynn’s degree in psychology from oxford will be able to convince you.

            Now fuck off, bitch.

          • Meeple

            Heck why not add 100 to the malnourishment adjustment lol. There you go Indians has potential to have an IQ of 200.

            OUR soldiers you say? So I was correct on both the butt hurt and non Brahman Indian and maybe even open defication but I will hold off on the last one as that’s a 50/50.

            No seriously what’s this TIMMS report you keep on harping on about. Link please. I assume this isn’t the TIMSS since that doesn’t help your case.

          • Aron Deon

            20 iq for malnourishment is not an estimate. It is an observation based on research. Here you go with timms:-
            http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2008/06/17/000158349_20080617085945/Rendered/PDF/wps4644.pdf

            Remember, iq is calculated on UK norms.
            Page 49 and 50:-
            England: 496, new Zealand: 492, orissa: 404, rajasthan: 382, india(rajasthan and orissa average): 392.
            Indian timms score is 100 points behind uk. One standard deviation on timms is 100 points.
            1 standard deviation is 15 IQ.

            This is the case when european kids spend 2 hours extra per day in schools and i am comparing uk with india’s pooresr provinces (check indian statea by gdp). And average kid in uk spends 75x higher on tuition than in india. And educational system in india is much worse.

            Norway and serbia score 461 and 477. 8 or 9 IQ points ahead.
            If india’s poorest states are scoring 85, indian average is surely 89 as of 2007.
            As mentioned, iq in india is currently 91 as little bit of malnourishment has been removed since 2007 and there are so many studies or research articles.

          • Meeple

            Link please for TIMMS

          • Aron Deon

            http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2008/06/17/000158349_20080617085945/Rendered/PDF/wps4644.pdf

            This article discusses indian kids performance on TIMMS. I have already mentioned page numbers.
            Lastly, the authors are one indian and one european.

          • Jing Wei

            you got cause and effect backward, the reason Indians are malnourished is precisely because of lack of IQ. It’s like saying Sub-Saharan Africans should be much smarter because they are malnourished. No, these Africans can’t feed themselves precisely because they have low IQ, the same can be said about Indians as well. So no, you won’t get added bonus for undernourishment.

          • Aron Deon

            Kolkata:-

            http://www.atimes.com/article/kolkatas-chinese-live-in-stateless-sorrow/

            “They were shoe-makers, tanners, restaurateurs, hair-dressers or dry-cleaners.”

            You are literally comparing us to low IQ people who are shoe makers in India which is offensive for us. Yes the Chinese in india are outperforming their iq else you would expect them to be beggars in India. Indeed they cannot attain a higher status in india as you just don’t have the brains. It is undisputed that indian scientists have far higher research output than chinese or Japanese as evident in the stats. Whether you approve of the actual stats or not or live in dream land of supremacy (see Dunning Kruger effect, perfectly describes your people).
            As far as your baseless allegations are concerned that top tier chinese vastly outperform top tier indians, one way is to compare research output per scientist across all nations where there is no comparison with your people.
            Else the Chinese living in USA are top tier and everyone migrated with university degree where again there is no comparison. I would assume that your remaining comments are due to jealousy and hatred and would empathize on you.
            And please stop crying English as even in Hong Kong, it is undisputed that indians earn way above chinese at par with top tier chinese. So your mandarin is not working as well. Lol.

          • Jing Wei

            lol, shoemakers, thanks for point out lowest and poorest chinese go live in India, while the best chinese live in China. you are proud indians are comparing to lowest tier chinese peasant who migrated to india, lol. Indian in china are the lowest tier of the tier. The best chinese stay in china starting companies like baidu, alibab, tencent which combined have more market valuation than entire Indian IT industry combined. while best indian can only migrate to first world countries created by whites and east asian and serve in whites and chinese/japanese created companies. Indian have no ability of creating first world countries on your own. even in hong kong, lol, you comparing indian who migrated to hong kong working in high paying field to all hong kong people also including cleaners and the poor? the billionaires in hong kong are 100% chinese. Again, when you comparing 100% chinese vs. 100% indian in the world, the chinese make 6X more money, 20X more billionares, east asian have astronomically more nobel prize winners than south asian, Indian universities are such low quality that the best can only go to first tier high IQ chinese and white created societies to make a living. Indian scientist are such low quality even chinese and japanese high schoolers are better, lol. that’s why Indian universities are such a dump that you can only send people to English speaking societies serving only in white created companies. lol, lol.

          • Aron Deon

            Can you stop trolling. Chinese in India are Han chinese who migrated to do trade with india and do not have an IQ 5 points below than average chinese. And it is proven by research.
            Indians migrated to Hong Kong in ww2 to fight the Japanese army. And are also not college educated people.

            They may do better in a low IQ nation like china and may have incomes way above low Iq chinese, but in indian society they were only soldiers.
            India has been the richest nation on planet for entire millinea despite having much lower population than China (2x less). And have created environments which your people could not dream. Now your people have copied west and have a fake misconception of supremacy (see Dunning Kruger effect). It isn’t really true.

            So china outperforming india is an abnormality which may only last 20-50 years only due to china being a bigger nation geographically and higher natural resources or providing cheap manufacturing labour.

            And do not take pride in japanese or korean nobel prizes. Chinese haven’t won more top notch awards than Indians. Even though china has 10x more scientists than indians, number of nobel prizes is 12 vs 8. If you include other prizes like nobel in algorithm, maths fields prizes, etx. Indians are still ahead.
            The primary reason that chinese scientists are not winning such high end prize than indians despite having 10x more people working and much bigger infrastructure on research is due to small brains. Lmao.
            Even historically indians have contributed much higher to mankind than a toilet paper or gun powder from chinki land. So history speaks for itself regarding who has the brains.
            Lastly if you can prove that chinese in india who migrated to do business and are smarter than locals in Hong Kong based on the observation of indians are low tier chinese, i will hear from you. Do include evidence instead of crying like a pig.

          • Jing Wei

            lol, korean nobel prize winner, low iq indeed. East asian have astronomically higher nobel prize winners than south asian, ethnic chinese are significantly more than ethnic indians in noble prize winners. removing white people who simply lived in India, the real ethnic Indian who won science noble is only 5 compare to chinese 12. The Han chinese, lol. Han is not even an ethnicity, it’s all people who conquered by Han and then converted, that including low iq southern “han” chinese bordering Indian that migrated to India. when counting 100% indians and 100% chinese in the world, chinese has 10x more billionaires, 6x more incomes, 10x more startups in billion dollar range than the Indians, the number is simply staggering, Indian with low iq are behind on so many levels. While Indian love to compare millions of Indians who are doing better than the chinese, Chinese have billions that are doing better than the Indians.In top notches awards and international competitions, chinese trumps Indians whether its Physics, chemistry, math, even the google computing competiton, there’s no indian in top 10 year after year after year while china is consistently in the top 10. The only thing Indians are proud of, speaking their colonial master’s language the English, that’s why they can only win in rote memorization competition like spelling bees. that’s why Indian have iq of 82 and china has 105. although indian have 1000x more english speaking researchers than chinese, they still come up with such paltry number of international research papers and patent filings. throughout the history, China beat Indian hands down in science, invention, wealth, despite Indian have 3x more population than the chinese. Indian below china is not an anomaly, it’s normal, India had always been below china throughout its entire history. don’t blame your low iq on lower nutrition, you have lower nutrition and starving like the Africans precisely because you have low iq, so stop trolling across the web.

          • Aron Deon

            “Despite indian having 3x more population than chinese.”
            “Historically china have been ahead”.
            “Chinese have higher research output than indian scientists”.
            “China has billions that are doing better than indians. How many billions, 20 billion ? Lol, the population of china is 1.3 billion with 90 pc wealty among top 1 pc population”
            “China has 10x more billionaires. I guess it is 500 vs 125.”
            “China does not have 10x more startups than india. India has higher startups than china. Indian Americans have more start ups than entire east asia.”
            I guess i wasted my time with a troll after seeing your replies. How does india have 3x more people than china.

            And people in north china are not smart as well. Indians are living in Hong Kong and Singapore which are the highest scoring regions of china. There is simply no comparison at all with your people. Bye tc.

          • Jing Wei

            Lol, you just provided number India is way behind China in income, wealth, nobel prize, technology. Silicon valley? Even counting all the mom-and-papa fly-by-night shops started by Indian in Silicon Valley, Chinese still have 10x more startups in billion dollar range than the Indians. Again, when counting 100% indians and 100% chinese in the world, chinese has more billionaires, more incomes, more startups in billion dollar range than the Indians, the number is simply staggering, Indian with low iq are behind on so many levels. While Indian love to compare few millions of Indians who are doing better than the chinese, Chinese have billions that are doing better than the Indians, yes, that’s 1.4 billion vs. 1.2 billion, even if India has 100 million doing better than chinese (which of course is impossible, the real number is only couple million indians are doing better) China would still have 1.1 billion people doing better than the Indian. Chinese living bordering India are actually the dumbest, that’s Southwestern Chinese, not Southeastern Chinese like Hong Kong or Singapore. Again, Indian have no ability creating first world nations like Chinese and whites, Indian can only migrate to first world countries created by Chinese to make a living and serve in white/chinese/japanese created companies. Right, a troll like you calling me a troll, good job, lol.

          • Aron Deon

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore
            Household incomes by race in Singapore:-
            Indians: 7700, chinese: 7290, malays: 4575.
            Indians migrated to Singapore as peasants in British empire or as construction workers in post 20 th century. Hardly 5 pc indians in Singapore migrated to work.
            Besides the incomes, indians have far better university enrollment among the local population. 35pc indians in Singapore make it to universities vs 22 pc chinese. Indian potential in Singapore is clearly hampered by lowly chinese and malay races.
            So even your smart people are no match to indians. Worthless subhumans chinkies.
            And stop writing chinese/whites in your sentence, it is offensive. Indians have large number of e commerce, IT and semiconductor companies. But we don’t take pride in that as the concept of alibaba, etc is western and indians and chinese have copied it.
            Copying may be way above your subhuman potential and hence chinese proudly write about alibaba in every other post, but we don’t consider it as an achievement. Hence you will never see indians bragging about Flipkart or Paytm etc.
            Indian startups in silicon valley are way better on quality than start ups in east asia. So many indians are ceos of American firms while chinese don’t even make it. Your chu cha chu copied organizations don’t stand a chance against companies like google which are owned by indians.
            Lastly chinkies are bare shoe makers in India which us their actual cognitive potential. It is a baseless claim that chinkies in india are dumb kind of chinkies. They may even be smart chinkies just like retarded subhumans living in Singapore who are also no match to us. It is virtually impossible that there wikk exist any multi racial society where Indians and chinamen will live and you will see Chinese doing better. Whether it is Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, usa, Kolkata, uk.
            Lastly Indians in india are bately farmers. Compete with indian incomes in indian cities which is first world.
            Before the world was dominated by whites, it is undisputed that India had created much better environment than chillies. You have been following our religion and not the other way around. Search about description of India in ancient chinki literature

          • Jing Wei

            hahahahah, when low wi

          • Jing Wei

            Of course Chinese is so much more dominant historically than India, when people ask 10000 people, 9999 people would say China as ancient civilization, when people in the west talk about ancient civilizations, it’s always, china, china, china or occasionally japan, less than 1% would even think about India.

            Again, Indian can only immigrate to high IQ english White/chinese created societies like Singapore, Hong Kong, US and UK and work for white/chinese/japanese created companies, companies like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo and Youtube are all chinese/white owned and created with Indian serving at those companies and Indians just can’t create anything significant on their own. While Chinese are creating companies like Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu which are kicking all of Indian IT company’s butt, just these 3 companies have more market valuation than entire Indian IT industry combined, lol, that’s high IQ Chinese vs. low IQ Indian right there. The reason Indian don’t talk about Flipkart is because even when Indians copy, they can’t even copy it right and still come up way short due to lower IQ capability. Indian not only can’t come up with innovative and original companies, they can’t even copy anything right and they can only immigrate to chinese/white created societies to even accomplish anything.

          • Aron Deon

            There is a concept called regression to the mean IQ. Even if Chinese who migrated to india had lower IQ than indigenous population, their IQ would regress to the mean value in one generation. So they represent the genetic potential of average Chinese. Lastly Chinese in India migrated to do trade and I guess traders in your nation do not starve.
            On the other hand, Indians in Singapore migrated to work as peasants in British empire. They didn’t migrate to leech off resources and rather Britishers brought them.
            If flipkart is an embarrassing company, the same can be said about alibaba. Lol. There is nothing special which alibaba provides that is not provided by flipkart or Amazon.
            Higher market cap is due to higher usage of e commerce company in China. As sales of e commerce company in India increase, flipkart will reach the top. Like how micromax is now among the top 10 smartphone makers in the world.
            I will leave it to other people to reply to your crying and begging messages. Bye . TC.

          • Aron Deon

            There is a concept called regression to the mean IQ. Even if Chinese who migrated to india had lower IQ than indigenous population, their IQ would regress to the mean value in one generation. So they represent the genetic potential of average Chinese. Lastly Chinese in India migrated to do trade and I guess traders in your nation do not starve. Yes they are shoemakers in India as they are genetically incapable and low IQ. LOL. What an embarrassment that you are portraying this fact as an achievement. That’s why we throw bananas to chinkies as this is what humans do (throw bananas to monkeys, lol). And having a round eyed face is considered more attractive than light skin by your people. this is what your women worship. If I give an option to 100 chinese to change their faces to look round eyed, most will agree.

            On the other hand, Indians in Singapore migrated to work as peasants in British empire. They didn’t migrate to leech off resources and rather Britishers brought them. Singapore is created by Indians and lowly chinese and malays are just living there with lower incomes and lower university enrollment, just like how black majority is just living in south africa (a first world society made by whites) and how monkeys are living on earth. Without the indians, singapore will be like some third world city like beijing full of shit and shit people worshiping white men and their round eyed faces (not white skin). chinkies cannot create a first world city on their own. and do not include taiwanese or japanese cities as chinese as they will be offended by your pathetic attempt of writing japanese/chinese or taiwanese/chinese or white/chinese. do you ever write monkey/humans ? No. It is as offensive as you writing white/chinese trying to club yourself with your masters. the only first world city with chinese majority they made is singapore which is due to indians living there (evident from income and uni stats, lol). even equitorial guniea has better first world environment than china. They even bend down to indians in singapore as they look whites. inferior people full of inferiority complex. LOL.

            If flipkart is an embarrassing company, the same can be said about alibaba. Lol. There is nothing special which alibaba provides that is not provided by flipkart or Amazon. Many of the chinese companies have same logos as western companies from which they copies. Cannot create a logo. LOL. Most chinese organizations sell pathetic products, higher than your intellectual abilities but still beneath us. Quality and china are considered opposite. LOW IQ indeed.

            Tata group has a revenue of 103.5 billion USD, 20 billion of it coming from TCS only. Infosys has a revenue of 9 b USD. wipro 7.7 b, cogniizan revenue: 12.2 b USD (created by indians in usa).

            Revenues of Alibaba: 14 b USD, Tencent: 14 b USD, Baidu: 9 b USD. It is just offensive that you are even comparing the revenue of your shitty IT organization with an IT superpower like India (yes we are the biggest exporter of IT services in the world, high IQ required, pick precautions).
            Just the Tata IT group (TCS and others) has higher revenue than all the 3 chinese companies that you have mentioned and falsely farted that they have higher revenue than all Indian IT firms, only to misinform people here. indeed a pathetic subhuman attempt to be recognized as equals by others. Even if you include TCS and Infosys alone, they have higher revenue than top 3 Chinese firms.

            You low IQ chinkis can only succeed in china and as a matter of fact, anyone can succeed in such low IQ nations. Even your college grads are starving up there in australia with 3x lower incomes than indian australians. Low IQ indeed. 70% chinkies migrated to australia with a bachelor’s degree. It isn’t a surprise that they have way lower incomes in Australia than indians and gen population (beneath our consideration and your subhuman begging on this forum will not help !!!!).
            Anyone can succeed in chinki land. Here is the proof:-
            http://www.scmp.com/news/china
            “HSBC survey shows China accounts for 29pc of all overseas workers earning US$250,000 a year”.

            Literally no other human population (I don’t know if I would rate your people as humans or subhumans) does worse compared to expats, not indicating a smart population at all. Your race is just inferior, full stop. even though most of the talented expats go to USA, the expats in china (despite being poorly selected for intelligence) simply thrash the locals and vastly outperform the top tier chinese. Welcome to the reality.
            Higher market cap of alibaba is due to higher usage of e commerce company in China. As sales of e commerce company in India increase, flipkart will reach the top. Like how micromax is now among the top 10 smartphone makers in the world. As most US companies are banned in China, it is easier for them to grow.

            As far as your farted claims of nobel prize is concerned, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
            It is 12 vs 10. But 2 were whites who lived in india. So, it is still 12 vs 8 on nobels. And one nobel was shared among two chinese and is considered one invention. So, nobel achievements are only 11 vs 8 for china vs india.

            most of the japanese prizes are shared. one award is give to 2/3 japanese at a time. we don’t share credits for our discoveries just to increase the nobel count per nation. LOL. Real number of nobels from japan is 25 and number of discoveries are 16. Not much off from India.
            Other major awards considered nobels in their fields:-

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
            Fields medal since 2000, Indians: 1, East Asians: 1 (Terrence Tao)

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
            Abel Prize: Indians: 1, East Asians: 0

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
            Godel Prize: Indians: 8, East Asians: 1

            What about non-natural science nobels ? LOL. There are 15x more people doing research in east asia with 13x more research budget and yet this is the share of top notch awards. But again as you need brains to win such high end awards, it isn’t a surprise that chinkis are doing hopelessly bad. Indeed, if you count “Nobels+nobels in maths and computers”, it is 18 vs 13 discoveries for india vs china (still ahead of your people).

            “So, Indian nobel winners >> Chinese”.

            And you need to have a WMI to win a spelling bee. It is called working memory. If your race does not have a brain to remember a few words, then you can only cry for failure in your post. Period.

            Indian companies in silicon valley are next generation technologies like Brain machine interface, virtual reality, cloud computing. They will not reach top level until the field grows. Cognizant technology solutions is one such billion dollar company founded by indians. and unlike youtube where there were 2 whites and one taiwanese (their assistant most probably), cognizant is purely made by indians.

          • Jing Wei

            Same reply as above, lol

            lol, the black asian niggers love to brag about their little achievement. Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong are all ethnic chinese societies, I guess your low iq can’t tell Taiwanese nationals are 99% ethnic chinese, lol. Low IQ asian nigger can’t create any high IQ societies on their own and have to move to white/chinese majority created societies to survive, Singapore is 75% chinese, Hong Kong is 99% ethnic chinese, taiwan is 99% ethnic chinese. When you compare south asian vs. east asian, the number is even more astounding, the south asian niggers get destroyed everywhere you look, hahahahaha. No wonder these asian niggers are buying whitening cream to look less nigger like, LOL, LOL, LOL. East asian create first tier world and societies, south asian countries are all shitholes on par with sub-sahara africans, even China is like first world compare to any south asian majority countries by magnitudes, hahahahaha.

            Even the low iq southewestern chinese who traditionally considered as low iq chinese are better than Indians. After regression to the mean for these low iq Chinese from places bordering India, who can’t survive in China can now survive in India, hahahaha, India is just a low IQ society even low iq southwestern Chinese from bordering India can survive. If they had stayed in china, these low iq Chinese from places bordering India would have died.

            Of course, Indians love speaking their white master’s language, making it their official language, taking pride in their white master’s english spelling bees, putting on whitening cream to look like their white master, but at the end of the day, they still look like niggers lol. Without these dot head niggers, Singapore would be so much more better. That’s why these asian black nigger love to migrate to chinese/white societies, especially after 1990, these asian niggers are flooding Hong Kong and Singapore in order escapes their low IQ poop-land, To date, there isn’t a single south asian majority first tier cities or country, asian black niggers can only go to Chinese/white majority cities and countries to make a living. That’s why 99% rest of the world including websites, video, forums all indicate Indian are low IQ and Chinese are high IQ. That’s even despite the fact that under the same trade, global policies and global environment, and even when west are transferring tech to India treating India like their best friend, while Chinese is being treated as an enemy, Indian as low IQ country still can’t perform and is still sub-sahara like, while china is 100X more modern and high tech than India or any south asian majority or created societies combined.

            While high IQ nations such Germany, Norway, UK, France, American(white) Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore (east asian) all have top tech companies based in their home countries, Indian are such low IQ that they can only open up mom-and-pop shops and survive in majority Chinese/east aisan/white created high IQ societies. LOL. Yahoo and Youtube are all created by Taiwanese national of Chinese ethnicity, to date, Indian don’t have anything even remotely close to Yahoo. Indian can only do IT outsourcing with no product of its own, because they have low IQ and can’t create products. That’s why Chinese tech companies, baidu, alibaba, tencent, Huawei, xiaomi, DJI…. Are 100x bigger than anything low IQ south asian can ever dream of coming up with.

            Again, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Taiwan, Singapore (east asian) Germany, British, French, American(white) all become successful and rich in their own countries, low IQ Indian can only go to high IQ Chinese/east asian/white created societies to survive, because Indian can only create low IQ societies like sub-Sahara Africans, HAHAHAHAHA.

            The top 3 Chinese IT companies have more market valuation than entire Indian IT industry combined

            Asian nigger’s so called Flipkart is 1/6 of Alibaba size, while Alibaba transaction volume is already Amazon+Ebay combined, beating any western companies of its category, that’s why Flipkart is inferior, not surprising, as it’s an Indian company.

            Indian brag about 0.0000001% of Indian richer than 0.0000001% of Chinese
            While Chinese have 99.99999% of Chinese that are 6X richer than 99.9999999% of Indian.
            Chinese global fortune 500 companies 98, Indian 7
            Ethnic Chinese science Nobels 9 vs Indian 5, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (Raman, Sen, Khorana, Chandrasekhr, Ramakrishnan)

            Ethnic chinese literature Nobels 2, vs. Indian 1
            Global top 300 universities, Chinese 10: Indian 0
            Chinese math Olympiad winners 24 years, Indian 0
            Chinese physics Olympiad winners 26 years, Indian 0
            Chinese chemistry Olympiad winners 22, Indian 0
            Chinese income >6x Indian
            Chinese billionaires >>> Indians
            Chinese unicorn startups >10x Indian

            Chinese (companies+universities+Noble+google computing+universities+math/physics/chemistry medals) >>>> Indian

            Indian most proud competitive achievement, English spelling bees >> Chinese, with white master’s English being Indian official language, LOL.

            Chinese character competition (Chinese spelling bee), Chinese >>> Indian with Chinese being Chinese official language, LOL.

            here’s the kicker, east asian IQ is around 105, south asian IQ is around 82
            therefore, Chinese + Japanese (same race) Nobel prize winners >7X South Asians combined. While Indian with 5 science nobels practically discovered nothing.

            And that’s despite the fact that Indian has 1000x more English speaking researchers publishing on English publications than Chinese and Japanese combined

            East asian (same race) >>>>> south asian (same race) in technology and IQ. South asian including Indian is just vastly inferior than East Asian, lol.

            Again, that’s why 99.9999% of rest of world as indicated by all the videos, studies, PISA, forums all pointing Indian as low iq 82 (bordering retard) and Chinese is high IQ (105). HAHAHAHAHA. That’s why 99.99999% of Indian or south asian for that matter are such failure compare to 99.9999% Chinese and East asian, keep crying, hahahahahaha.

          • Aron Deon

            And lastly stop ranting as how Chinese are capable to create better civilization than india. If you ask 1000 people which nation had better ancient civilization, 900 would say Indians. And the remaining would be mostly Chinese as well. Even your own people admit that India had much bigger impact on China in history than other way around.
            Lastly Indians in India do not make less money than other nations. Yes 70 pc are farmers, but if you considwr those who are living in cities, the incomes are no less than European cities. India’s per capita income is also in 6000+ range on ppp basis. With highest GDP growth rate. Countries like China , Thailand may be ahead; but they are not the best. China ranks 92/180 nations on incomes. And isn’t something to brag about.
            Wait for 3 years and Indian ppp incomes will reach 110 from 130 based on current growth rate. And it will rise to the top of the world again.
            Besides chillies who only do well in China and fart in other places or against expats in their nation and give baseless reasons that foreign Chinese are low tier Chinese, Indians are the best in India and best abroad.
            We have the highest incomes in USA. And 20 more nations like Singapore will follow.
            Are ethnic Chinese best performing ethnicity anywhere. You are only better than pinoys.
            Why I am comparing incomes in such multi racial societies. Because the best way to compare two ethnicities ito give them same living condition same school and everything at par. And in any such circumstances, chinkies fart against Indians.

          • Aron Deon

            Chinkies have not been able to feed themselves than many African nations. Search GDP per capita of equatorial guinea. Trinidad and Tobago.
            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

          • phead128

            Religion does not require IQ. All ancient India export to China is religion but religion does not require high IQ

            There is a strong correlation between IQ and Atheism, and China is the largest Atheist country on earth but India and Pakistan are still killing each other over religion like feudal times.

          • Aron Deon

            Our soldiers means that during ww2, indians and britishers fought the japanese in hong kong. Indian soldiers participated and are living in hong kong since 1940s.

  • Aron Deon

    Great, i have checked and read your references in your article.
    First two are crap and book publications where they recite Richard Lynn’s work.

    Mohanty and Babu, 1983 are on kond tribals in Orissa which is not the average. They are just selecting a specific caste or race in India (tribals who will obviously have lower IQ, 87).

    Afzal, 1988 shows 92 IQ in urban areas in Bihar (which is again a low IQ state and is “the poorest state”, not second or third poorest, the absolute poorest state). Consistent with your data up there.

    Others require authentication. Wait I will expose you

    • Jing Wei

      Shangdong province iq in China is 107.9, so yes Richard Lynn did sample chinese in Shandong province. IQ link below and please click on Shandong province.

      http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=40493

      while China and Japan suffered devastation of WWII, Indian sufferer no war and had best infrastructure in Asia left by the British in the 1950s. Yet in the years ensued, China and Japan are decades ahead of Indian in every aspect. So yest, IQ makes a huge difference.

      • Aron Deon

        Wang, 2001 (Average IQ of 76-81)
        Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/wang-2001.pdf
        Shandong province, china.

        Hong, 2001 (Average IQ of 65-82)
        Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/hong-2001.pdf
        Shandong province, china.

        Ren, 1989 (Average IQ of 75-85 appx.)
        http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/ren-1989.pdf
        Shandong Province, China

        IQ of 81, 82 and 85 are in low fluoride regions (optimum environment).

        • Jing Wei

          Shangdong province iq in China is 107.9, so yes Richard Lynn did sample chinese in Shandong province. IQ link below and please click on Shandong province.

          http://www.targetmap.com/viewe

          while China and Japan suffered devastation of WWII, Indian sufferer no war and had best infrastructure in Asia left by the British in the 1950s. Yet in the years ensued, China and Japan are decades ahead of Indian in every aspect. So yest, IQ makes a huge difference.

          and please 82 IQ indian, southwestern chinese are yunnan people, don’t you know where yunnan is, that’s the lowest iq chinese ever, and you are proud of comparing to low iq chinese? lol.

          Indians can’t never match Chinese, whether its native or expat, 99.999999% Chinese are 6x times richer than 99.999999% dark niggers. Equitorial Guniea is richer than china, what does that make India, dot head niggers Indian would be 10x worse than even Quitorial Guniea then? Hahahahahahaha.

          That’s why even Indian expat living abroad are shit compare to Chinese, even that 0.00000001% of best of Indian are poorer than tens of millions of chinese millionaires and billionaires. Chinese are still are 6x richer than >>>>>>>> Indians. Lol.

          Dot head niggers can only migrate to Chinese/white created societies and leech off like parasites. Because Singapore and Hong Kong both Chinese societies are so much better than these low iq dot head niggers can ever create.

        • Aron Deon

          I presented 3 research articles showing IQ in shandong province to be 81, 82 and 85 in optimum living environments. you have presented one map which is based on one iodine study done on internet in china.
          as most of china is pooping on streets and only 45 pc have internet access (smart ones), it is obvious that “internet based tests” will show much higher results.

          secondly, china iq map is based on raven’s progressive matrices which will suppress low verbal IQ of china. it is well known that overall iq of china is 6 points below raven’s progressive matrices.

          thirdly, the china iq map ignores low iodine regions in shandong province and all over china.

          overall, it is obvious that even as per your china iq map, iq in shandong province is 107 non-verbal IQ (iodine sufficient), 101 overall IQ (iodine sufficient). And 94 overall IQ (iodine sufficient + iodine deficient).

          On top, the study is done on internet users and only 55 pc people in shandong province use internet. so, overall IQ for shandong province will only come to 85 IQ, adjusting for dumb non-internet users. evident in china’s fluoride iq samples which was done on general population and not on internet users.

  • Aron Deon

    Mind updating your GCSE UK results. Obviously they are decade old.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/399005/SFR06_2015_Text.pdf
    Chinese: 74.9,
    Indians: 72.9 (1 Standard deviation above whites)
    Whites: 56.4
    Sample size: All nation.

    The results in UK school fluctuate so heavily every year that I know that you have just used pessimistic results for Indians in UK probably motivated by trolls on internet.

    • Jing Wei

      source for 2015? Chinese have consistently outperformed Indian in UK year after year after year, even if 2015 were an abnormality, Chinese still betters Indian in number of years outperformed, that’s even given majority of Chinese families speak Chinese at home with many parents have no English proficiency, while majority of Indian in US and UK speak English at home. The language handicap alone is impairing yet Chinese still outperforms Indian years after year after year, the only reason why such handicap was overcome is because of Chinese higher IQ.

      • Aron Deon

        https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/399005/SFR06_2015_Text.pdf

        Chinese: 74.1 pc, Indian: 72.9, whites: 56 pc.
        Both indians and chinese outscore whites by one standard deviation. 2015 is not an abnormality. Indians are outperforming whites by ‘half to one standard deviation since 2009.
        Now about English proficiency, chinese in uk do not have lower English proficiency than indians. The tests are on second generation Indians and chinese who leaen English since class 1. Indians in UK do not speak en at hime. And even if they speak, indian English proficiency is not higher than whites. So at any cost, indian IQ in second generation in UK is not less than 115 based on GCSE.
        Note: indians in uk, Canada and Australia are from one state and are living in significant numbers. And representative of atleast 40 pc population of that state. As indians in uk are 1.6 million. Total punjab population is 20 million. Atleast 40 pc punjabis are living in Australia, Canada and uk (all achieve school results one standard deviation above whites).

        Rather if you look about GCSE results per subject in link above, chinese outscore indians on English while Indians outperform chinese on maths.

        Yes, your GCSE results are at par with Indians. But indians in uk have much higher incomes as they outperform Chinese in post school careers primarily due to higher intelligence.
        Now your people are crying over English. It is undisputed that only 5pc of indians can speak English. The reason they cover English handicap or mandarin handicap in Hong Kong is due to superior intelligence.
        Chinese in india speak English and Hindi with 100 pc proficiency. The reason they are genetically incapable of doing better than what they are doing now (being shoe makers) is also due to brains. Now you are comparing with indian indigenous population. So you cannot cry due to smart migration from india.

        • Jing Wei

          yet when comparing 100% chinese vs. 100% indian in the world, Chinese make 6x more than indians, 20x more billionaires, 20x more startups in the billion dollar range. The Indian, like the Filipinos can only survive in their former colonial master’s language, east asian have astronomical higher nobel prize winners than south asians, ethnic chinese have significantly more nobel prize winner than ethnic indians. While best and smartest Indian go work and serve in first world countries created by high iq whites and chinese, indian have no ability of creating first world country on their own. the best can only migrate to and take advantage of first world infrastructures created by high iq whites and chinese. it’s obvious, Indians in general are much much poor than chinese, have less scientific output than chinese and japanese, even when their official language is english and all college education are in english. Yet they still have much much less scientific contribution, low IQ indeed. lol.

  • Aron Deon

    Average IQ in Chandlolia district in Ahmedabad:- 104 (large proportion of upper caste Hindus)
    Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-2007.pdf

    I bet average IQ in Uttar Pradesh (even higher proportion of upper caste Hindus) will score 112+ if Ahmedabad is scoring 104 as in the report above.
    Average IQ published for India is crap and misunderstood.

  • Aron Deon

    Let me help you pin down the IQ of India based on the studies.
    IQ of Bihari muslims as in the article you cited:- 93 in urban and 78 in rural areas. I will exclude inbred people. Sample size of rural and urban is same. Average IQ of muslims in Bihar:- 85.5
    As Bihar is “the absolute poorest state”, IQ of muslims all over India: 90.

    IQ of upper caste Hindus:- 110-112 (based on Indian americans), GMAT expected scores for India (107 overall IQ, and probably 112 for upper caste, 104 average IQ reported in Ahmedabad). On top of that “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indians_in_Hong_Kong” . Indians outperorm Chinese in Hong Kong (113 IQ) on socio-economic and educational factors. Certainly Indians in Hong Kong have average IQ of 120 and they cannot have higher IQ than top 5% of upper caste Hindus which will put average upper caste at 110 (minimum).

    IQ of dalits and tribals:- 80 based on your cited article on Orissa kond tribals.

    Average IQ of India (many people have already pinned down. See this well informed article https://pumpkinperson.com/2014/09/29/caste-iq-in-india/ )
    25% dalits and tribals: 80 IQ
    15% muslims: 85 IQ (I will put in 90 as muslims in Bihar are scoring 85, average muslim all over India has to be higher no doubt, but the person intrapolated Lynn’s article on muslims in Bihar to average muslim all over India)
    40% backward caste: 95 IQ
    20% upper caste: 110 IQ

    Average IQ shown by this person: 92.75 ( I have calculated 93.5).

    This is the absolute floor (lowest estimate) of India’s IQ before malnourishment adjustments and everything. Based on Lynn’s study and all cited articles

  • shanbarani

    http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/09/14/national-merit-semifinalists-announced/

    This is the 2017 California National Merit list, top 0.5% of high school
    IQ = 139

    Chinese = 850
    Korean = 100
    Vietnam = 75
    Japan = 25

    Jew = 125

    Muslim = 55

    Indian = 275
    of which

    Brahmin ( 5% ) = 120
    Merchant ( 5% ) = 60
    Rajput ( nobility ) ( 5% ) = 15
    Kayasth ( scribe ) 5% = 10
    Forward Caste Dravidian (non-Aryan South Indian ) ( 5% ) = 60

    The top 25% of castes cover 265 / 275 slots

    then we come to the kulaks, large farm peasants
    Patel = 4
    Jat Sikh = 3

    UK Indians are 80% Patels and Sikhs

    US Indians are 20% Patels and Sikhs, 20% Brahmin, 20% Merchant, 20% Forward Caste Dravidians

    Low castes, untouchables = 3 wins

    • Aron Deon

      It is unfair if you are doing comparison of ethnic groups in USA. Indians in USA are 60pc upper caste and not 25 pc. If you were to do it in India, upper castes will only make 200 and not 265 out of 275 seats. USA has 20 pc brahmin population and india has 5 pc brahmin. So, such tests done in India may not have such huge brahmin over representation . Only 15 pc instead of 40 pc currently in USA.

      • shanbarani

        Assam- 1 Brahm / 1 Total
        Bengal – 13 Brahm, 6 Kayasth / 19 Total
        Gujurat – 3 Brahm, 14 Jains, 6 Hindu Bania, 4 Patels, 1 OBC / 28 Total
        Hindians – 14 Brahm, 2 Kayasth, 1 OBC, 20 Bania, 9 Rajput / 46 Total
        Kannadiga – 14 Brahm, 2 Gowda, 2 Lingayat / 18
        Kashmir – 1 Brahm / 1
        Kerala – 1 Brahm, 6 Nair / 7
        Maharashtra – 18 Brahm, 2 Kayasth, 2 Maratha / 22
        Odisha – 1 Karan / 1
        Punjab – 3 Jat Sikh, 17 Khatri / 20
        Sindhi – 6 Bania / 6
        Tamil – 44 Brahm , 20 Dravidians / 64
        Telugu – 16 Brahm, 28 Dravidian / 64

        The point is , even within same linguistic group. there is a huge chasm from Upper castes like
        Jain vs kulak caste Patel

        and

        Tamil Brahmins alone have as many winners as all Hindians put together – 50% of the Indian nuclear blast team of 1974 was Tamil Brahmins, who are just 0.2% of the Indian pop

        Indian IQ is like a layer cake with a thin High-IQ elite, like Brahmins, Bania and Upper Caste Dravidians ( about 15% of total pop ) and there is a huge chasm from this upper caste layer to the middle caste kulak layer, like Patels and Jat Sikhs , these kulaks possibly function similar to blue collar white Euro – similarly there is another IQ chasm from the kulaks like Patel, Jat Sikh to the Dalit, Tribal sections – average them all, and 82 IQ average looks probable, may go upto 90, with more nutrition

        • Aron Deon

          People from UP and Bihar are virtually inexisting in USA. They make up 30 pc of india and 70 pc of Hindi speakers. India may not have same distribution of top scorers vs linguistic group and caste . As Indian USA diaspora does not have same distribution of ethnic groups and linguistic groups as india. Telugu make up 10 pc of Indians in us. Not the same in india 7 pc. Better will be if you present CAt or JEE or aipmt scorers vs caste. Name wise results are available on net

        • Aron Deon

          Secondly there is massive trolling on other blogs like “IQ vs caste for india” by Marlin. That 50 pc of IIT rank holders are tamil or SIB (south Indian brahmin).
          The reality:- http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/in-other-news/130616/raghul-is-tamil-nadu-topper-in-in-iit-jee.html
          Not even 6 pc of IIT rank holders are tamil unless what people claim on internet.
          So make sure if you get some data on internet, it is supported with a source or proper web link.

  • Aron Deon

    To Jing Wei (as my comment got spammed):-

    There is a concept called regression to the mean IQ. Even if Chinese who migrated to india had lower IQ than indigenous population, their IQ would regress to the mean value in one generation. So they represent the genetic potential of average Chinese. Lastly Chinese in India migrated to do trade and I guess traders in your nation do not starve. Yes they are shoemakers in India as they are genetically incapable and low IQ. LOL. What an embarrassment that you are portraying this fact as an achievement. That’s why we throw bananas to chinkies as this is what humans do (throw bananas to monkeys, lol). And having a round eyed face is considered more attractive than light skin by your people. this is what your women worship. If I give an option to 100 chinese to change their faces to look round eyed, most will agree.

    On the other hand, Indians in Singapore migrated to work as peasants in British empire. They didn’t migrate to leech off resources and rather Britishers brought them. Singapore is created by Indians and lowly chinese and malays are just living there with lower incomes and lower university enrollment, just like how black majority is just living in south africa (a first world society made by whites) and how monkeys are living on earth. Without the indians, singapore will be like some third world city like beijing full of shit and shit people worshiping white men and their round eyed faces (not white skin). chinkies cannot create a first world city on their own. and do not include taiwanese or japanese cities as chinese as they will be offended by your pathetic attempt of writing japanese/chinese or taiwanese/chinese or white/chinese. do you ever write monkey/humans ? No. It is as offensive as you writing white/chinese trying to club yourself with your masters. the only first world city with chinese majority they made is singapore which is due to indians living there (evident from income and uni stats, lol). even equitorial guniea has better first world environment than china. They even bend down to indians in singapore as they look whites. inferior people full of inferiority complex. LOL.

    If flipkart is an embarrassing company, the same can be said about alibaba. Lol. There is nothing special which alibaba provides that is not provided by flipkart or Amazon. Many of the chinese companies have same logos as western companies from which they copies. Cannot create a logo. LOL. Most chinese organizations sell pathetic products, higher than your intellectual abilities but still beneath us. Quality and china are considered opposite. LOW IQ indeed.

    Tata group has a revenue of 103.5 billion USD, 20 billion of it coming from TCS only. Infosys has a revenue of 9 b USD. wipro 7.7 b, cogniizan revenue: 12.2 b USD (created by indians in usa).

    Revenues of Alibaba: 14 b USD, Tencent: 14 b USD, Baidu: 9 b USD. It is just offensive that you are even comparing the revenue of your shitty IT organization with an IT superpower like India (yes we are the biggest exporter of IT services in the world, high IQ required, pick precautions).
    Just the Tata IT group (TCS and others) has higher revenue than all the 3 chinese companies that you have mentioned and falsely farted that they have higher revenue than all Indian IT firms, only to misinform people here. indeed a pathetic subhuman attempt to be recognized as equals by others. Even if you include TCS and Infosys alone, they have higher revenue than top 3 Chinese firms.

    You low IQ chinkis can only succeed in china and as a matter of fact, anyone can succeed in such low IQ nations. Even your college grads are starving up there in australia with 3x lower incomes than indian australians. Low IQ indeed. 70% chinkies migrated to australia with a bachelor’s degree. It isn’t a surprise that they have way lower incomes in Australia than indians and gen population (beneath our consideration and your subhuman begging on this forum will not help !!!!).
    Anyone can succeed in chinki land. Here is the proof:-
    http://www.scmp.com/news/china
    “HSBC survey shows China accounts for 29pc of all overseas workers earning US$250,000 a year”.

    Literally no other human population (I don’t know if I would rate your people as humans or subhumans) does worse compared to expats, not indicating a smart population at all. Your race is just inferior, full stop. even though most of the talented expats go to USA, the expats in china (despite being poorly selected for intelligence) simply thrash the locals and vastly outperform the top tier chinese. Welcome to the reality.
    Higher market cap of alibaba is due to higher usage of e commerce company in China. As sales of e commerce company in India increase, flipkart will reach the top. Like how micromax is now among the top 10 smartphone makers in the world. As most US companies are banned in China, it is easier for them to grow.

    As far as your farted claims of nobel prize is concerned, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
    It is 12 vs 10. But 2 were whites who lived in india. So, it is still 12 vs 8 on nobels. And one nobel was shared among two chinese and is considered one invention. So, nobel achievements are only 11 vs 8 for china vs india.

    most of the japanese prizes are shared. one award is give to 2/3 japanese at a time. we don’t share credits for our discoveries just to increase the nobel count per nation. LOL. Real number of nobels from japan is 25 and number of discoveries are 16. Not much off from India.
    Other major awards considered nobels in their fields:-

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
    Fields medal since 2000, Indians: 1, East Asians: 1 (Terrence Tao)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
    Abel Prize: Indians: 1, East Asians: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
    Godel Prize: Indians: 8, East Asians: 1

    What about non-natural science nobels ? LOL. There are 15x more people doing research in east asia with 13x more research budget and yet this is the share of top notch awards. But again as you need brains to win such high end awards, it isn’t a surprise that chinkis are doing hopelessly bad. Indeed, if you count “Nobels+nobels in maths and computers”, it is 18 vs 13 discoveries for india vs china (still ahead of your people).

    “So, Indian nobel winners >> Chinese”.

    And you need to have a WMI to win a spelling bee. It is called working memory. If your race does not have a brain to remember a few words, then you can only cry for failure in your post. Period.

    Indian companies in silicon valley are next generation technologies like Brain machine interface, virtual reality, cloud computing. They will not reach top level until the field grows. Cognizant technology solutions is one such billion dollar company founded by indians. and unlike youtube where there were 2 whites and one taiwanese (their assistant most probably), cognizant is purely made by indians.

    • Jing Wei

      lol, the black asian niggers love to brag about their little achievement. Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong are all ethnic chinese societies, I guess your low iq can’t tell Taiwanese nationals are 99% ethnic chinese, lol. Low IQ asian nigger can’t create any high IQ societies on their own and have to move to white/chinese majority created societies to survive, Singapore is 75% chinese, Hong Kong is 99% ethnic chinese, taiwan is 99% ethnic chinese. When you compare south asian vs. east asian, the number is even more astounding, the south asian niggers get destroyed everywhere you look, hahahahaha. No wonder these asian niggers are buying whitening cream to look less nigger like, LOL, LOL, LOL. East asian create first tier world and societies, south asian countries are all shitholes on par with sub-sahara africans, even China is like first world compare to any south asian majority countries by magnitudes, hahahahaha.

      Even the low iq southewestern chinese who traditionally considered as low iq chinese are better than Indians. After regression to the mean for these low iq Chinese from places bordering India, who can’t survive in China can now survive in India, hahahaha, India is just a low IQ society even low iq southwestern Chinese from bordering India can survive. If they had stayed in china, these low iq Chinese from places bordering India would have died.

      Of course, Indians love speaking their white master’s language, making it their official language, taking pride in their white master’s english spelling bees, putting on whitening cream to look like their white master, but at the end of the day, they still look like niggers lol. Without these dot head niggers, Singapore would be so much more better. That’s why these asian black nigger love to migrate to chinese/white societies, especially after 1990, these asian niggers are flooding Hong Kong and Singapore in order escapes their low IQ poop-land, To date, there isn’t a single south asian majority first tier cities or country, asian black niggers can only go to Chinese/white majority cities and countries to make a living. That’s why 99% rest of the world including websites, video, forums all indicate Indian are low IQ and Chinese are high IQ. That’s even despite the fact that under the same trade, global policies and global environment, and even when west are transferring tech to India treating India like their best friend, while Chinese is being treated as an enemy, Indian as low IQ country still can’t perform and is still sub-sahara like, while china is 100X more modern and high tech than India or any south asian majority or created societies combined.

      While high IQ nations such Germany, Norway, UK, France, American(white) Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore (east asian) all have top tech companies based in their home countries, Indian are such low IQ that they can only open up mom-and-pop shops and survive in majority Chinese/east aisan/white created high IQ societies. LOL. Yahoo and Youtube are all created by Taiwanese national of Chinese ethnicity, to date, Indian don’t have anything even remotely close to Yahoo. Indian can only do IT outsourcing with no product of its own, because they have low IQ and can’t create products. That’s why Chinese tech companies, baidu, alibaba, tencent, Huawei, xiaomi, DJI…. Are 100x bigger than anything low IQ south asian can ever dream of coming up with.

      Again, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Taiwan, Singapore (east asian) Germany, British, French, American(white) all become successful and rich in their own countries, low IQ Indian can only go to high IQ Chinese/east asian/white created societies to survive, because Indian can only create low IQ societies like sub-Sahara Africans, HAHAHAHAHA.

      The top 3 Chinese IT companies have more market valuation than entire Indian IT industry combined

      Asian nigger’s so called Flipkart is 1/6 of Alibaba size, while Alibaba transaction volume is already Amazon+Ebay combined, beating any western companies of its category, that’s why Flipkart is inferior, not surprising, as it’s an Indian company.

      Indian brag about 0.0000001% of Indian richer than 0.0000001% of Chinese
      While Chinese have 99.99999% of Chinese that are 6X richer than 99.9999999% of Indian.
      Chinese global fortune 500 companies 98, Indian 7
      Ethnic Chinese science Nobels 9 vs Indian 5, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_Nobel_laureates (Raman, Sen, Khorana, Chandrasekhr, Ramakrishnan)

      Ethnic chinese literature Nobels 2, vs. Indian 1
      Global top 300 universities, Chinese 10: Indian 0
      Chinese math Olympiad winners 24 years, Indian 0
      Chinese physics Olympiad winners 26 years, Indian 0
      Chinese chemistry Olympiad winners 22, Indian 0
      Chinese income >6x Indian
      Chinese billionaires >>> Indians
      Chinese unicorn startups >10x Indian

      Chinese (companies+universities+Noble+google computing+universities+math/physics/chemistry medals) >>>> Indian

      Indian most proud competitive achievement, English spelling bees >> Chinese, with white master’s English being Indian official language, LOL.

      Chinese character competition (Chinese spelling bee), Chinese >>> Indian with Chinese being Chinese official language, LOL.

      here’s the kicker, east asian IQ is around 105, south asian IQ is around 82
      therefore, Chinese + Japanese (same race) Nobel prize winners >7X South Asians combined. While Indian with 5 science nobels practically discovered nothing.

      And that’s despite the fact that Indian has 1000x more English speaking researchers publishing on English publications than Chinese and Japanese combined

      East asian (same race) >>>>> south asian (same race) in technology and IQ. South asian including Indian is just vastly inferior than East Asian, lol.

      Again, that’s why 99.9999% of rest of world as indicated by all the videos, studies, PISA, forums all pointing Indian as low iq 82 (bordering retard) and Chinese is high IQ (105). HAHAHAHAHA. That’s why 99.99999% of Indian or south asian for that matter are such failure compare to 99.9999% Chinese and East asian, keep crying, hahahahahaha.

      • Aron Deon

        That’s why Chinese (south western, tibetans or south eastern, both) are shoe makers in India. While Indians are doing far better in China.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indians_in_Hong_Kong

        “The history of Indians in Hong Kong can be traced back to the early days of British Hong Kong. When the Union flag of the United Kingdom was hoisted on 26 January 1841, there were around 2,700[1] Indian troops that participated.”

        “The majority of them are managers, administrative officers and technological fields like Engineers.”
        “Also, around 15% restaurants in Hong Kong are operated by Indians.”
        “The percentage of Indians earning more than $30,000 per month is higher than that in the total working force of Hong Kong, or other South Asian nationalities.”
        30 pc vs 11 pc for Chinese.

        Looking at the incomes of Indians in Hong Kong and income distribution, I am qualified to say that “even Indian troops” that participated in WW2 are far superior than common man in Hong Kong. Whether you like the fact or not or cry in desperation showing literature nobels and ignoring economic nobels or whatever “cherry picked stats” you want to show. “Facts are facts”.

        Lastly, hong kong attracts top 1 pc of Chinese graduates as it is the best city in China and far higher amount of high skill immigration takes from “china to Hong Kong” than “India to Hong Kong”. The incomes used to be way lower for Chinese in 1980 (below Pakistanis, that’s a shame). even in your “china IQ map”, which is inflated; the IQ of Hong Kong is 8 points above average for China.

        And last but not the least, ” Meanwhile, other Indian communities such as Marwaris and Tamil Muslims came to Hong Kong for trading”. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indians_in_Hong_Kong

        Indians who have migrated to Hong Kong after WW2 are predominantly Muslims. If you happen to read the discussion here, Muslims in India have the lowest IQs among any ethnic groups in India. So even they are sufficient to beat you. So, you are indeed far inferior to Indians.

        National GMAT scores:-

        http://poetsandquants.com/2014
        Average GMAT score:-
        USA: 533, India: 577, China: 581

        Indians, Chinese and Western psychometric expert have done mappings that GMAT is representative of 50 pc Indian population. SAT, etc. have the same trends.
        Indeed Indian kids despite having lowest PISA scores (nobody out of 100,000 could solve Pythagoras theorem) have the highest SAT, GMAT, GRE scores on average.

        Intelligence is all about learning and applying concepts. Despite spending 4 hrs per day less on schooling, not knowing any maths till PISA age; they have among the highest GMAT, SAT scores (maths score at par with China as well) implying superior intelligence.

        Why I am showing “Chinese performance in India” and “Indian performance in China”. I am not bragging. I am just showing how Chinese will do in India, and Indians would do in China. All these kind of stats are required for average IQ calculations.

        This forum is about average IQ of two nations. If you want to discuss industry, market, etc. There are other forums where you will get proper replies by others.
        Bye. TC.

        I will leave it to others to reply to your mentally disturbed messages.

      • Aron Deon

        Haha. Just checked your natural science nobel list for china on wikipedia.
        Ei-ichi Negishi (Japanese who was born in China). Edmond H. Fischer (white man born in china). Walter Houser Brattain (white man born born in china). “These are not ethnic chinese ? LOL”

        China has only produced 5 natural science nobel winners, for 4 natural science discoveries. India has also done 4 natural science discoveries despite having 10x less scientists in India. LOL.
        make something like a Boson particle (a top 5 natural science discovery).

        I just presented GMAT scores for India, SAT scores ,etc. below. That’s enough I guess. It is clear who is superior.

        South Western Chinese are known as Tibetans, South Eastern Chinese in India are called chinese.
        You have yourself admitted that your people are far inferior. That’s it. I will leave it to the rest of the people to reply to your mentally disturbed messages.

        • Jing Wei

          Hey dot head nigger,

          99.9999% of Indian can’t even qualify to take SAT or GMAT because they are too dumb, that’s why 99.99999% of Indian are sitting in mud house eating poop filled dirt. while the other 0.0000001% of best indian flock to chinese societies such as Hong kong and singapore and becoming slaves of chinese societies. Yes hong kong and singapore are all 100% politically and economically controlled by the chinese. little Indian slave, hahahahaha.

          The Chinese science noble prize 9 vs indian 5

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
          Yang, Dao Lee, Tu youyou, Tsui, Kao, Yuan Lee, Ting, Chu, Tsien (9) None-chinese born in China (3 Walter, Edmond, Ei-chi Negshi)

          chinese literature nobel 2 vs. indian 1

          everywhere you look chinese are almost 2x as much as indian in noble, hahahaha.

          That’s why even Indian expat living abroad are shit compare to Chinese, even that 0.00000001% of best of Indian are poor than tens of millions of chinese millionaires and billionaires. Chinese are still are 6x richer than >>>>>>>> Indians. Lol.

          High IQ nations, Germany, France, UK, France (white iq 100), China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Korea(east asian iq 105) all create billionaire dollar companies in their own counties, and becoming successful in their own countries.

          India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka (south asian 82) can only go to Singapore, Hong Kong, US, Australia, chinese/white created societies to make a living because south asian can never able to make their own first world countries, hahahaha. 99.9999% Chinese are 6x richer than 99.9999% Indian, most Indians are starving eating shit at home because they are too dumb. The only one making middle class wages in India are street cleaners, that’s why east asian and whites look at dot head niggers just like African niggers, 99% chinese are racist in these dot head nigger’s face, hahahahhahaa.

        • Aron Deon

          “everywhere you look chinese are almost 2x as much as indian in noble, hahahaha.”
          Just presented incomes by race everywhere (LOL) in USA, UK, australia, Hong Kong, India, Singapore. Most of the places chinese are earning 2x less.
          Worst is India where chinkies are shoe makers and now are trying to save their ass by falsely claiming that chinese in india are low tier.
          that’s why we are so racist on your face. call you chinkies. make fun of your slanty eyed faces and small cocks. all you can do is nothing. lol.
          as i am not into arguing with a pathetic piece of shit like you who even claimed in his writing that india has 3x more people than china, i will kindly block you.

          • Aron Deon

            As they say, ”

            IQ AND BRAIN MATTERS WHILE MONKEYS AND CHINKEYS DO NOT.

            Here I present to you a butt-hurt Chinkfag (Jing Wei) who is trying his best to prove that his race does not suck using all kinds of stats in the world. LMAO.

          • phead128

            God you are so smart and superior u replied to your own comment.

            What a fucking idiot.

      • Aron Deon

        And lastly, high IQ elites from China who migrated with a university degree to leech off the resources of white nations (like how they leeched off 2 nobels from whites living in china, lol) are sitting beneath the table with Indians at the top. Yes, our college grads are moving abroad to white nations to leech off resources. even your people are doing the same. The only difference is that they end up selling teas and cleaning our sh** all over the world, anywhere both races are present (whether it be usa, aus, canada, germany, singapore, hong kong, india as well). lowly race indeed, lol, lol, lol. If you want us to consider you as equals, show that they can attain a same status in Australia. Period. It does not matter if monkeys are ruling the jungle. Anyone can succeed in the jungle as I showed in HSBC link where anyone can succeed in China.
        Lastly, Equitorial Guniea is a better first world environment than China with higher incomes. so you are worse off than guinea pigs. even worse off than niggers.
        China a first world society. LMAO. whole world knows, it is a c grade manufacturing hub, a third world nation which worships white men. check their per capita incomes. monkeys even like to brag about c-grade manufacturing chop shops to serve their white masters who are serving us in their own nations.

        http://www.cbsnews.com/news/latest-trend-sweeping-china-lighter-skin/
        “Skin lightening product market in china is 2 billion USD, 62x bigger than india”. lol. piggies trying hard to look white to lie about their race in white nations and get a truck driver to marry. nice way to increase your iqs. white wannabe who would brag about white nobel prize winners in their nation.

        Anyways you are right. Indians are lazy and cannot create toilets in their nation. Why don’t your people send your top 10 university graduates as we would like to outsource toilet making kind of work to races that deserve it. LOL. We will keep sending construction workers to singapore what we are doing now to increase the university enrollment in future generation or incomes in that lowly nation. Or expats to china who will earn above 250,000 $ evident in hsbc survey. pigs abroad, pigs in their homeland. lowly indeed. crying and farting over immigrants from india who are mainly physical laborers.

        • phead128

          India is an backwards shithole compared to China. You should be ashamed to talk about superior IQ and use dumbass examples.

          • Aron Deon

            China is an embarrassment. And what is more embarrassing is people like you bragging about a third world nation like China which is way below world average on development. Even though Indian per capita income is only at par with Chinese 2006 level, the quality of life is far better. People get free homes if they are poor. Cost of living is 10x cheaper. So Indians are enjoying far better life than Chinese even as of today. You should be ashamed of even comparing us with lowly people who are shoe makers in India. That’s offensive and derogatory.

          • Jing Wei

            Indian get free mud home and eating poop covered dirt, that’s what low iq people get, free home, hahahhahaha, even african niggers get free home too, it’s called mud house. your low iq people can’t create any first world societies, ever. and Indians can only compare to lowest of chinese who can’t make it in china but can make in india, hahahahhaa, what an embrassment, no wonder 99% of indian are eating poop covered dirt and starving, while 99% chinese are creating supercomputers and making 6X wages, the indian are cheaper by 10x, because the entire country is sub-sahara african like, that’s why it’s so cheap. hahahahhahaha.

          • phead128

            You know he is probably a white guy pretending to be Indian to make the Chinese and Indians hate each other? Don’t take internet trolls serious especially if they are pretend Indian but actually white.

            Indians won’t say stuff about IQ superiority that is not oriental way. It’s western trying to get hatred between Asian giants that say these things.

          • Aron Deon

            Haha. As they say, “IQ and brain matters while monkeys and chinkies do not”.

            Keep guessing my race, PHead (Pea Sized Head).

          • phead128

            China HDI is higher than Indian HDI, so the Indians can not possibly be enjoying a better life than Chinese because of inferior HDI levels. Everything is just your opinion which doesn’t matter, evidence matters not opinions.

          • Aron Deon

            There is no proof that China has better engineers or outperforms india on engineering.

            Here are some of the stats for you:

            1. Academic research:-

            http://www.scimagojr.com/count

            This is the number of research articles published out of each nation in international journals in 2015 (including chinese and japanese). Top 3 in Asia:-
            1. China: 416,000
            2. India: 123,000
            3. Japan: 109,000
            4. Korea: 73,000

            Nigeria: 5,000
            Vietnam: 4,092

            Vietnamese people (ethnically same as Chinese) perform worse than Nigeria. I will not compare any South East Asian nation as they are nowhere close to India (even adjusting for population sizes).

            Let me compare India v/s China v/s Japan:-
            Number of researchers per million (http://data.worldbank.org/indi
            India: 137, Japan: 5300, China: 1087.

            Even with 4x lower scientists than Japan (most of Indian scientists being selected for being lower caste and not merit), Indians have beaten the Japanese research foundation.
            And our scientists are 4-5x more efficient than chinese counterparts.

            2. Number of start-ups:-

            http://readwrite.com/2012/10/19/why-are-indians-so-entrepreneurial-in-the-us/
            “The number of Indian startups went up from 26% to 33% of all immigrant startups.”

            Indians form up-to 15% of all start-ups in Silicon valley. And 12% all over USA.

            http://www.startupranking.com/countries
            Number of start-ups by nation:-

            USA: 8344, India: 3061, Nigeria: 448, Japan: 132, South Korea: 112, China: 39.

            Indians living in USA alone have more start-ups than “Japan, Korea and China combined”. On top of that, India has 10x more start-ups than entire East Asia combined. Especially in areas of unexplored technologies like AI, Embedded Systems, Brain Machine Interfaces. Rather India is third in the world after USA and UK on start-up ecosystems.

            http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/india-ranks-third-in-global-startup-ecosystem-nasscom/articleshow/49341735.cms

            East Asia has no equivalent. Most of the companies from East Asia are pathetic copies of west. When it comes to start-ups with some new idea, they rank 10x worse in number s and quality.

            India is racing ahead on cloud computing, AI, chemical engineering research. even in supercomputing fields where India heavily trails rest of the world, India has beaten Japan and Korea. India has 9 super computers in top 500 (vs 17 for Korea and 28 for Japan) with the numbers expected to jump to 40 with new supercomputers coming up.

            3. Patents:-

            http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile/profile.jsp?code=CN
            http://patseer.com/2016/07/india-patent-trends-for-2015-2016/

            Huwaei, zte and tencent are top 3 companies in china filing 3400 , 2100, 1086 patents.

            Top 3 companies in India are Qualcomm india, ericson and robert Bosch generating 1067, 723 and 505 patents.

            Even though these indian mncs have much lower staff than say Tencent china, etc. by a factor of 5x. The IP generation is comparable.

            Only on total number of patents does India trail East Asia which is due to individual filing from East Asia. MNC filing is at par.

            Even if you compare top most companies from East Asia vs their Indian offices, Indian offices perform better in most cases.

            Innovation Stats from Samsung Korea v/s Samsung India:-

            http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile/profile.jsp?code=KR

            Samsung Korea generated 1381 patents from Korea last year.

            http://www.dpahuja.com/pages/not

            Samsung India software operations generated 205 patents from India. Reports are above.

            Number of employees:-

            http://tejas.iimb.ac.in/articles/50.php

            “The number of employees at SISO has grown extensively from 700 a few years back to a current strength of 2600+.”

            Number of employees in Samsung South Korea:-

            http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/english/features/focus/10285-exponential-growth-number-samsung-electronics-employees-exceeds-300000

            “The number of the company’s employees in Korea has remained at around 90,000 to 100,000 since 2011. “

            Despite having 36x more employees than Samsung India office, attracting best talents from South Korea (v/s having worst reputation in Indian university and attracting lowest grade Indian graduates) and having much higher investments on research and development in South Korea (70x), Samsung South Korea files only 6.7x more patents per year than it’s Indian counterpart office. Which gets to show you the obvious superiority of Indian engineers.

            “OTHER THAN TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE DOING RESEARCH, WORKING IN INDUSTRY; EAST ASIAN NATIONS HAVE NO ADVANTAGE WHATSOEVER.”

            Even your brands are better established as Chinese economy is bigger and they sell more products.

          • Jing Wei

            what kind of shit link are you quoting, just red first and bottom part of the post, china alone has over 60 unicorn startups, and the you are showing 39? wow, indian with their own made up links, lol.

            https://www.cbinsights.com/research-unicorn-companies

            you brag about engineers while they have to work at Samsung, so you can’t succeed in your company, you have to work at east asian company to come up with any patents, then you say you are more efficient? It’s like the same I’ve saying before, Indian can never create first world countries, cities and companies, they have to rely on chinese/east asian/white companies and societies to even do anything. Like I said, Indians can’t do anything because 99% sitting at home eating shit-covered dirt while the other 1% is working at chinese/east asian/white created companies at chinese/east asian/white created societies. lol.

          • Jing Wei

            The fact that vietnamese is the same race as chinese, japanese and korean indicate it has strong potential to be one of the high IQ society. There are 5 chinese/korean/japanese societies that are first world, while Indian and south asian have not demonstrated they can create a single high iq, first world tier countries indicating Indian have no potential of creating high IQ societies on their own and the college graduate will continue to flock to chinese/east asian/white created societies and companies to survive.

          • Jing Wei

            Silicon valley startups are created by 99% FIRST GENERATION INDIANS, while even with their best people using white/western infrastructure, these startup still pales in comparison to the Chinese startups by a huge margin. Chinese unicorn startups are 6X number of Indians (both in India and Indian in the US), meaning Indians best live in the west still can’t come up with anything comparable to China’s, while chinese best live in China and starting things Indian can only dream of. It’s proven over and over, even Indian best using western infrastructure can’t compete with chinese in technology. That’s why Indian both native and abroad are trailing way behind chinese in technology and wealth. Indian can only brag about their 0.000001% that are richer than 0.000001% chinese, while china has 99.9999999% that are richer than 99.9999999% of indian.

          • Aron Deon

            Well. Those who are commenting as how “Smart Indians are migrating to SGP” and are successful because they are college graduated.
            It is complete bullshit.
            Local Indians in Singapore who are living for 3 generations in SGP are super successful while “expat Indians” are mainly construction workers who were construction workers in India as well.

            Indian population in Singapore:-

            https://themigrationist.net/2014/01/08/riot-in-singapores-little-india/

            “Of these, 760,000 are ‘low-skilled’ male migrant workers on work permit.”

            “It has been estimated that South Asian men number around 300,000, they fall under the ‘low-skilled’ category and are hired largely in the construction industry.”

            http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/rapid-growth-singapores-immigrant-population-brings-policy-challenges

            “Due to policies instituted in the 1990s to recruit the highly skilled in nontraditional source countries, however, the majority of skilled workers (apart from Malaysians) are now from China and India”

            This is the kind of Indian expats in Singapore. As shown above in official Singapore news channels, majority of low skilled “Construction workers” in Singapore are from India and China.

            Physical labourer kind of expats in Singapore are 300,000 South Asian (150,000 Indians which make up 25% of Indians in Singapore). And 200,000 Chinese (negligible population). and as shown that these are expats.

            On the contrary, Indians in USA beat top 0.00001% of white population as well.

            US maths olympiad teams for past 2 years:-

            https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2016
            https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2015

            Yuan Yao
            Allen Liu
            Ashwin Sah
            Junyao Peng
            Michael Kural
            Ankan Bhattacharya

            Allen Liu
            David Stoner
            Yang Liu Patil
            Ryan Alweiss
            Shyam Narayanan
            Michael Kural

            3 Indians, 3 East Asians, 2 whites, 1 Jews.

            This is the US physics olympiad 2016 finalists:-

            https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2016/upload/2016-Semi-Finalists-Medals-4.pdf

            There are 32/230 candidates as Indians, 150/230 candidates as Asians. Remaining are jews, whites, latinos, etc.

            Intel Talent Search:-

            https://student.societyforscience.org/intel-sts-2016-finalists
            There are 14 Indians, 14 East Asians and 10 remaining races.

            Population size: Indians: 3 million, East Asians: 6 million, Whites: 200 million.

            Similarly in Singapore:-

            Singapore Maths Olympiad:-

            http://sms.math.nus.edu.sg/Competitions/SMO2015.aspx#Open
            http://sms.math.nus.edu.sg/Competitions/SMO2014.aspx#Junior
            http://sms.math.nus.edu.sg/Competitions/SMO2013.aspx#Open
            http://sms.math.nus.edu.sg/Competitions/SMO2012.aspx#Open
            http://sms.math.nus.edu.sg/Competitions/SMO2011.aspx

            Many of them are repeat. So, I am counting them once.

            There are 2/85 Indians. 0 whites.

            Singapore Physics Olympiad:-

            http://www.physics.nus.edu.sg/~phyips/SJPO2011_results.pdf
            http://www.physics.nus.edu.sg/~phyips/SJPO2012_results.pdf
            http://www.physics.nus.edu.sg/~phyips/SJPO2014_results2.pdf
            http://www.physics.nus.edu.sg/~phyips/SJPO2015_results.pdf

            There are appx. 88/1200 Indians. 2-3 whites. Remaining Chinese and Malays (sorry I cannot distinguish based on their names).

            Population size: 74% Chinese, 7% Indians, 13% Malays, 4% white Caucasians.

            If you look at the US maths, science teams etc. Indians outnumber whites (not only in top 4 but also in top 300). Despite being 1/100 th in population size.

            Similarly in Singapore national physics olympiads, Indians are numbered higher than white Caucasians and even higher than their general population size in Singapore, though lower on maths olympiads.

            And top 1 % Indians in singapore score in top 1% of population. whether you take “Singapore National Physics Olympiad” or any competitions.

            Similarly in Primary Olympiad as well in Singapore:-

            http://www.nushigh.edu.sg/qql/slot/u196/Announcement%20of%20SPSO%20Final%20Results%202016(1).pdf
            http://www.nushigh.edu.sg/qql/slot/u196/SPSO%20Final%20Results%202015.pdf
            http://www.nushigh.edu.sg/qql/slot/u196/Announcement%20of%20SPSO%20Final%20Final%20Results%202014.pdf

            There are 7-10 Indians in top 100 which is consistent with population size of Indians in Singapore.

            And many of the time, Indians are over-represented as well.

            So, stop putting crap here that how “smartest Indians are migrating to SGP” when Indian immigrants to SGP are mostly construction workers.

            And how Indians in USA only do better than general population, when they even beat the top 0.00001 pc whites (evident in USA maths, science olympiad teams).

            And lastly, needless to tell you that Indians living abroad number 50-100 million which are not 0.0001 pc of Indians (maths does not fit in).

            And smartest Indians are staying in India who do not move abroad.

            Most of the Indians that have migrated to USA, UK, Canada, Australia and all these places are from two Indian states (Punjab and Gujarat, not even 8% of India).

            Search about Indian immigration to overseas locations before commenting here.

            Lastly, I already showed that Indian immigration to Hong Kong is Muslims which are dumbest people in India. And even if you look at the income distribution of Indians in Hong Kong, even bottom 30 pc Indians beat bottom 40 pc Chinese. So at any cost, Indians in Hong Kong that migrated to fight the Japanese army (3rd generation Indians by now) is at-least performing at bottom 40% Chinese in Hong Kong.

            If you look into Chinese IQ map, Hong Kong scores 12 points above average Chinese in China (all provinces average at par with top 10 pc of China).

            So, at any cost; Indians that migrated to fight the Japanese army in WW2 is performing at IQ levels much above average Chinese in China.

          • Aron Deon

            couldn’t compete with kids of Indian construction workers in Singapore on university admits (smart as per your people, lol) and you are talking about competing with smart college grads of india.

            That’s why they say,
            “IQ and Brain matters while monkeys and chinikies do not.”

            I am not bragging that how expat Indians outperform overseas chinese. I am showing that there is virtually no place on earth where Indians and Chinese are living in one society and Indians have shown lower incomes (even our physical laborers in Singapore beat you). Now whites may be using your cheap manufacturing slavery and you may be proud of it. But we don’t care.

            If you are showing that chinese are richer than indians for past 20 years, then http://www.worldeconomics.com/Data/MadisonHistoricalGDP/Madison%20Historical%20GDP%20Data.efp

            99.999999999 pc of history, India is richer. And 0.0000000001 pc is Chinese cheap manufacturing labor service to USA (lol).

            You were and are still not worth consideration. Not even worth our poop converted dirt. As Indian expats in singapore (our manual laborers) might have shown you the price of Indian poop.

            Chinese brag about Chinese being richer than Indians for 0.000000000000001 pc history. Indians brag about being richer than Chinese for 99.999999999999999 pc time.

            Top 0.0000000000000000000000001 pc Chinese migrate to USA only to eat poop converted dirt of Indians.

            http://www.chinafile.com/multimedia/infographics/wealthy-chinese-are-fleeing-country-mad

            “Wealthy Chinese Are Fleeing the Country Like Mad”

            “33% of Chinese millionaires have moved out of China. Report is above.”
            “52% of those moved to USA (link above).”

            Millionaires in china – poop converted Indian dirt abroad.

            Indians in USA, UK, Singapore, Canada and Australia number 8 million and incomes in 100,000 USD + bracket (as shown above).

            Per capita income of China: 8000 USD. Number: 1.3 billion.

            Just the overseas Indians living in just 5 locations are earning close to 10% of what 1.3 billion chinese are earning. Imagine if I consider Indians living all over the world, that would be more money what entire population of Japan is making and at par with 35% of Chinese economy. Just calculate yourself based on Indians in UK, USA, etc.

            As your top 0.000000001 pc people living abroad are living in aid, it is not really meaningful to consider Chinki incomes abroad. Don’t believe me ?

            Incomes in Australia:

            http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3416.0Main+Features22008

            Indians: 539 $ per week, Whites: 484 $ per week, Chinki: 239 $ per week.

          • Aron Deon

            Chinese in India decreased in numbers as they have much lower breeding rates. Check breeding of Chinese in Singapore. It is 1.1
            Similarly they have much lower breeding rates all over the world. Due to which they decreased by 4x in india over the generations.

          • phead128

            You are so dumb, replying to ur own comment. Low IQ malnourished brain

          • Aron Deon

            Keep dreaming jingi pigs like how Indian expats in Singapore which are 75pc manual labourers (as shown via Singapore government data and not your crying messages) are smart migration. They have higher university admits than chinki and may be smart as per your levels, but for us they are dumb Indians.
            You are blocked once again and should not have unblocked low iq pigs like you. I will not reply or be able to see your messages from now on. So stop expecting replies from me.

          • phead128

            Why are you replying to your own comment you low IQ beast

        • Jing Wei

          hahahaha, 82 iq indian is so angry, he can’t even talk straight…. Hahahahhaha. the poopland dark niggers don’t even know what toilet is like, they are like niggers only shit in the open. Dot head niggers can only migrate to Chinese/white created societies and leech off like parasites. Because Singapore and Hong Kong both Chinese societies are so much better than these low iq dot head niggers.

          The Chinese science noble prize

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_Nobel_laureates
          Yang, Dao Lee, Tu youyou, Tsui, Kao, Yuan Lee, Ting, Chu, Tsien (9) None-chinese born in China (3 Walter, Edmond, Ei-chi Negshi)

          Vs. Indian (5)

          Noble prize, ethnic Chinese 9 vs. ethnic Indian 5, hahahahahaha.

          And dot head nigger think those 9 are not chinese, hahahahha, 82 iq niggers inidan, OMG, hahahahaha.

          Indians can’t never match Chinese, whether its native or expat, 99.999999% Chinese are 6x times richer than 99.999999% dark niggers. Hahahaha, Equitorial Guniea is richer than china, what does that make Indian, sub-human dot head niggers who’s 10x worse than even Quitorial Guniea? Hahahahahahah.

          That’s why even Indian expat living abroad are shit compare to Chinese, even the best Indian which represent 0.00000001% of Indian can’t beat the tens of millions of Chinese millionarie and billionaires. Chinese still are 6x richer than >>>>>>>> Indians. Lol.

          High IQ nations, Germany, France, UK, France (white iq 100), China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Korea(east asian iq 105) all create billionaire dollar companies in their own counties, and becoming successful in their own countries.

          India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka (south asian 82) can only go to Singapore, Hong Kong, US, Australia, chinese/white created societies to make a living because south asian can’t never able to make their own first world countries, hahahaha. 99.9999% Chinese are 6x richer than 99.9999% Indian, most Indians are starving eating shit at home because they are too dumb. The only one making middle class wages in India are street cleaners and toilet makers, that’s why east asian and whites look at dot head niggers just like African niggers, 99% chinese are racist in these dot head nigger’s face, hahahahhahaa.

          Even Indian best expats can’t beat tens of millions of millionaires and billionaires in China, 99.9999% of Indians in the world are cleaning toilets or sitting in their mud house eating poop sprinkled dirt and starving, while Chinese are creating supercomputers and manufacturing things that 82 IQ Indians don’t even know how to make, hahahahaha.

          Hahahaha, the Indian love learning their white master’s language, parrot their white master’s language, compete in their white masters spelling bees. The dark dot head niggers doesn’t matter how much whitening cream they use they still look like low IQ niggers, that’s why even expats Indians can’t match millions of high IQ Chinese millionaires and billionaires. While 99% of Indian are cleaning streets and eating poop covered dirts. Hahahhahahah.

          based on thousands of studies around the world. Chinese IQ 105, Indian 82, keep crying, hahahahahaha,

        • phead128

          Indians immigrants to US do better than Chinese immigrants to US because of ENGLISH which Indians inherited through British conquest of India.

          Chinese immigrants from China etc don’t have the same level of English as former British colonial subjects.

          • Aron Deon

            Indians obtain much higher economic status than Chinese in Hong Kong (mandarin environment). I don’t care about your excuses like english, smart ones staying back, etc.
            There is no way that average Chinese is smarter than Indians by “more than half standard deviation”. And our people in Hong Kong have confirmed it.

          • phead128

            Hong Kong speaks Cantonese and English not Mandarin.

            Indians excel in Hong Kong because Hong Kong is an ENGLISH environment, that’s why Indians do so well in ENGLISH environment like HK, where ENGLISH is an official language due to British colonial rules, which is same as India. That’s why India does well because their English speakers do well in English speaking Hong Kong

          • Aron Deon

            Search about jobs in Hong Kong. Most need Mandarin or Cantonese proficiency. Beside, they are living for two to three generations in Hong Kong and got their education there. Chinese in Hong Kong do not face language handicap at all.

          • phead128

            English is an official language in Hong Kong , you can get by completely 100% using English alone in Hong Kong. you use a poor example my friend.

          • Aron Deon

            http://news.efinancialcareers.com/hk-en/204045/asian-banking-jobs-where-you-must-speak-mandarin

            “Mandarin is fast becoming the de facto language in Hong Kong’s financial services industry and bankers who can only speak English and/or Cantonese are being frozen out of the job market.”

            Anyways, Indians in Hong Kong speak Mandarin and Cantonese as well.

          • phead128

            Cherry picking the finance sector . Do you have a brain? Stop fucking cherry picking a small fraction (25%) of Hong Kong economy.

            Only 50% of HK ppl can speak Mandarin, you fucking idiot.

            Malnourished brain can only know of cherry picking data and shitty Wikipedia citations

          • Aron Deon

            Hey phead (pea sized head), you claimed that you can get 100pc jobs in Hong Kong with English. Prove it now, Lol.
            When lowly people like you cannot argue, they resort to abusing, etc. You are blocked.

          • phead128

            Only 50% of HK ppl can speak mandarin, it’s not a Mandarin environment you dimbass idiot. English and Cantonese are official language of HK not Mandarin you idiot dumbass.

            You have no facts to support any of your arguments.

          • phead128

            You are such a fucking dumbass idiot. None of your stupid IQ arguments make sense and shithole India is so much inferior to China you should be ashamed by claiming superior IQ.

            Not one South Asian country has superior engineering or economics or high level of development better than East Asia country.

          • Jing Wei

            lol, Indian came after 1990s are practically all in the financial industry in Hong Kong and Singapore, the 3rd generation Indians are all living in the ghettos collecting welfare in Hong Kong and Singapore. Like I said, Indian can only go to first world tier cities created by chinese and whites to survive because Indian have 0 ability of creating first tier countries on their own. The flooding of college Indian into Hong Kong and Singapore are now majority of indian population in Hong Kong and Singapore. Yet, if you compare chinese finance elites with Indian finance elites, chinese still win by huge margin, Hong Kong and Singapore tycoons are 100% chinese, yet there are 0 indians. Indian can only compare their first generation college Indian who work in finance with all of Hong Kong and Singapore chinese populations, if you put in that 99% low iq Indian who left behind in India, Indian would still be 82 iq and chinese with 105 iq.

          • phead128

            What is the economic status in terms of income for Indian in Hong Kong?

          • Aron Deon

            30 pc Indians at top 10 pc Chinese level and median being 1.7x above. Wiki link is above. A research paper by Chinese government is in reference on wiki page. Overall, Chinese in Hong Kong are 12 iq points above average Chinese as per Chinese iq map. Indians in Hong Kong are Muslims as shown above who do not have iq.

          • phead128

            nobody takes Wikipedia as citation serious. Anyone can go and edit Wikipedia to say whatever they want.

            Wikipedia is a terrible source to cite, I expect better from high IQ Indian

          • Aron Deon

            2001年政府統計處. (2006). 香港南亞裔概況, P.15
            Wiki data is taken from here. I have checked both. The link is on wiki page and it is Chinese government publications as mentioned before.

          • Jing Wei

            all the 3rd generation Indians are all living in the ghettos collecting welfare in Hong Kong and Singapore, Indian came after 1990s are practically all in the financial industry in Hong Kong and Singapore, . Like I said, Indian can only go to first world tier cities created by chinese and whites to survive because Indian have 0 ability of creating first tier countries on their own. The flooding of college Indian into Hong Kong and Singapore are now majority of indian population in Hong Kong and Singapore. Yet, if you compare chinese finance elites with Indian finance elites, chinese still win by huge margin, Hong Kong and Singapore tycoons are 100% chinese, yet there are 0 indians. Indian can only compare their first generation college Indian who work in finance with all of Hong Kong and Singapore chinese populations, if you put in that 99% low iq Indian who left behind in India, Indian would still be 82 iq and chinese with 105 iq, like in the US, Indian can only compare their college educated first generation Indian with ALL OF WHITE people in the US, good job comparing apple to apple, moron. The elite chinese/white still beat elite Indian by a huge margin. Again you can only move to chinese/white created high iq societies to survive because you have 0 ability of creating one on your own. and 99.99999% of indians are poor and iq of 82, which has been confirmed over and over and over by thousands of articles and studies.

          • Jimmy Smith

            You dumb idiot, the British lost all their wars in northern India. Your Japan was bombed to shreds and you’re a vassal state with American army bases there. Hong Kong was colonized and then Korea also is a vassal state also. You forgot that half of Pakistan was Afghanistan and they lost all their Anglo Afghan wars there. Indians are not a race, there is the Aryan race and the Dravidian race. You then have minority Mongoloid and other tribal races. Even 3rd generation Chinese in America have bad verbal skills. Indians generally do better than Asians on verbal test.

          • phead128

            I don’t know what the majority of your rambling was related to, however in response to this snippet: ” Even 3rd generation Chinese in America have bad verbal skills. Indians generally do better than Asians on verbal test.”

            Proof that 3rd generation Chinese in America fair worse than 1st generation Indians in verbal tests. Proof, share your citation to support this assertion.

        • phead128

          The advantage that Indians have is they were forced to speak English during British rule so they thrive in English country in USA.

          Chinese immigrants cannot compete with Native English speakers like Indians , so you are Proud of your Colonial legacy.

          Only reason is that Indian immigrants in US have native English speaking due to British rule, where Chinese immigrants have worse English since they were nevertheless colonized by British.

          • Aron Deon

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population
            India is among the bottom half of the world on English proficiency with only 12 pc people knowing a word, way below Philippines 92 pc, Thailand , Spain and even mexico.
            Indians in USA also outperform whites and immigrants from UK (English inventors who can speak way better than us) by a very big margin and have shown iq of 112.
            Indians make up 33 pc of us maths Olympiad teams for past 2 years.

          • Jing Wei

            forced to speak english? yet after India independence, you still made english your official language and every single major colleges teach courses in english? that’s not forced by any means, you in fact embraced your former master’s language. So you compare 1.2b indian with english as official language with 250 million whites in english? and saying you are better? lol. good job comparing, you have 6x population advantage. The fact you can’t put your own language on the world map instead proud of speaking your former master’s language showing huge inferiority complex, which is the result of low iq. Like I said earlier, Indian sends the best english speaker and college educated to chinese/white created societies and companies, and leaves 99.9999% dumb indian back in india, which also explains why indian as a whole when counting 100% has 82 iq.

          • Deadmau5 Patton

            “yet after India independence, you still made english your official language and every single major colleges teach courses in english?”

            you didn’t mention that after all that, they still are some of the worst english speakers on earth. maybe one of the only english colonies who learned almost nothing.

      • phead128

        Don’t forget, the Mongoloids conquers India through the Mughal dynasty (Mughal means Mongol in Persian) because Babur can trace his lineage to Genghis Khan and Timur has Mongol blood as well.

        • Aron Deon

          Yes. Einstein has mongol blood as well. Same with Newton. Even now Chinese are conquering india by be. I wrote this comment out of amusement for the non sense that can be generated by mankind.
          http://mobile.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/hushih305253.html

          • phead128

            Exactly that’s why Whites like British Newton and Mongoloids like Mongol Babur all conquer India with ease because of Mongol connection. It’s pretty easy to conquer India with superior technology, ask Whites and Mongoloids.

            India is stronger than Chinese in esoteric achievements like religion and culture but in technical competency and engineering, Chinese are stronger.

            IQ tests measure technical competence not esoteric abstraction.

          • Aron Deon

            I don’t want to list ancient technology advancement of india as list will be too big. Anyways it is all your opinions which do not matter much.
            Read something about Indian ancient history. Dinosaur ruled the planet once and it does not mean they are smart.

          • phead128

            Good technology but still conquered by whites and mongoloids.

          • Aron Deon

            Even Arabs have enslaved white in history. So all this is due to fighting and army invasion and nothing to do with technology. India has the records of earliest and historic swords known to mankind. So even india would have conquered the world with ease in history.

          • phead128

            Indians can’t even unify themselves without Mughals or British getting involved.

          • Aron Deon

            Britain is 1/20 size of India. It is smaller than an Indian state. I can also claim that “Europeans cannot unify themselves while Bengalis have been unified for ages”. India is a unified nation while Europe is not as of 2016.
            Britishers or Mughals never unified India. Unified India was born after 1947.

          • phead128

            We are comparing China and India not fucking Europe. Stop changing the subject, China unified themselves where as India was never unified except very briefly under Ashoka Mauryan empire and then all fell apart and only until Islamic and British invasions did they unify India.

            India isn’t unified today you have Indus river valley civilization outside Indian territory and you claim to be superior civilization, but Indus River is outside Indian control, what a joke.

          • Aron Deon

            Lol. Looks like the pig head phead couldn’t understand my text. You claimed that Indians could not unify themselves without the British. Clearly you are comparing Indians with Britain as well.
            That’s the strategy of inferior races. While in your writing above, you have mentioned 100x as how india was conquered by Britain, etc. If you are comparing india and china, why include whites yourself. You brought the topic of British invasion of india. I never brought it Forward. The Japanese have already told us that it is so easy to conquer china and rape their women and mothers. And just about any Indian in china is far more successful than local. What a competitive garbage population.
            . Just like the other pig here jingi Wei, who is writing white/Chinese to make the monkeys/chinkeys look good. You also follow him.u know what it is called. It’s called licking the ass of someone superior. Your forefathers licked our asses, followed our religion and just see your own history. Don’t worry, we will give your people new asses to lick, slave. And Indian incomes in Hong kong is an indication of the start of new era where chinkeys will lick our asses again. Understood slave.

      • Jimmy Smith

        You’re out of your mind, nobody in India uses skin whitening creams and they’re not black either. Many Indians in northern parts are light skin naturally. You Asians love white people and worship them. You get skin lightening cream, eyelid surgery, and facial reconstruction surgery to look Caucasian in features but guess what? Indians are naturally Caucasian people without any surgery. Now go find an umbrella to cover up that tinted p/ss face skin of yours.

        • phead128

          US Supeme Court in 1923 ruled that Asian Indians are not “white” even if they are caucasian race, so Indians are not eligible to become naturalized citizens. So being caucasian race is meaningless, they still don’t think you are equal to them. So it’s funny you are so desperate to associate with whites, while the whites reject you. Mean while, the Japanese automatically get “honorary white” status by Nazi Germans, while you never see East Asian bragging about “honorary white” status, but Indians try to pretend to be “white” through “Aryan” status. HAHA

        • Jing Wei

          naturally white? hahahahaha. nobody uses skin whitening creams? lol. check your own indian news, the whitening cream you indian are so craving after is the biggest seller in your country. 99% of Indian I’ve seen while I was visiting India are dark as coal.

        • Deadmau5 Patton

          “You’re out of your mind, nobody in India uses skin whitening creams” you’re a liar. period.

      • James

        “Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong are all ethnic chinese societies” …. all three had been created by whites.

      • jz95

        You ever had your IQ tested?
        Judging by the quality of your comments, you must be pretty nigger-tier yourself.

    • phead128

      the low IQ is showing in this post.

      Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese all have higher average IQs than Indians, Pakistanis, Bengalis, Sri Lankans.

      Just look at the average IQ tests, average GDP per capita, average HDI, etc…

      • Aron Deon

        if GDP per capita is iq, then equatorial guinea (lowest iq) has higher GDP per capita than china. What a dumbass example you have given.
        Chinese are only worth being shoe makers in India which they are. See my comments below and you will low scoring iq samples on Chinese population, less than 85. And I have attached 10 reports, higher number of reports which your people brag about. Lol.
        One way to compare the relative smartness level of indigenous population in psychometrics is seeing how the target population does compared to expats. There is no comparison on that matter. As evident in HSBC link, expats in china far far outperform locals indicating dumb population. Case closed.

        • Jing Wei

          lol, that’s why indian only go to chinese/white created societies. It’s been indicated over and over again Indian and south asian race can’t create any high iq societies. Over 1000 reports and studies have indicated indians have iq of 85 and chinese have iq of 105, that’s why indian can never created any high iq societies on their own and can only flood to high iq chinese/white societies to achieve anything. lol, the chinese bottom tier low iq people can’t survive in china but can survive in india. hahahahahaha. That’s why every single 1000 sources out there indicate indian have iq of 82, and chinese have 105. hahahahaha.

          • Aron Deon

            There are only 10 iq reports on india showing low iq in 80s range, all from 1980s when 70 pc population was underweight. Secondly, currently india has iq in 97+ range based on iq samples from 2010 as malnourishment is removed.
            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_malnutrition
            China has 133.8 million malnourished people while india has 194 million. If you look at the graph, india has crossed china on removal of malnourishment status in 2015 for kids. China has more malnourished kids than india as of today by any report. And will beat china on overall malnourished people count by 2018. So we are better fed than your people. Lol.
            I can cite 36 research articles on china showing low iq in 80s out of total 95 studies done. Period. T

          • Jing Wei

            you are malnourished exactly because you have low iq. studies have shown chinese human index is 10x better than india, with better nutrition than indian overall. LOL, 1000 studies have done showing Indian have IQ of 82, chinese have IQ of 105. GMAT, lol. 99% of Indian are sitting in a mud house starving, 99.9999% of Indian aren’t smart enough to take GMAT, that’s why they are sitting in the mud house and starving. The best chinese graduates are creating companies like xiaomi, alibaba, tencent, baidu, huawei, DJI and becoming billionaires, just like Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese succeed in their own countries. The best Indian which are expats who can only go go Chinese/white created societies like Hong Kong and Singapore to survive, no wonder Chinese are always so racist against Indian, hahahahaha. yet, the best indian expats still can’t beat tens of millions of millionaires and billionaires chinese. 99% of Indian are living in mud house starving, 99% chinese are 6X richer than Indians. compare indian to chinese is such an embarrassment, no chinese would ever want compare to low iq Indians.

            The Chinese science noble prize 9 vs. Indian 5.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
            Yang, Dao Lee, Tu youyou, Tsui, Kao, Yuan Lee, Ting, Chu, Tsien (9) None-chinese born in China (3 Walter, Edmond, Ei-chi Negshi)

          • Aron Deon

            Hey slave. I showed a link that india has lesser malnourished kids than china. And even those who are malnourished are majority north east Indians who are not of Indian race. I am not counting Chinese born abroad as by counting that, even india will have 2 literature Nobel’s farted as 1 literature Nobel by you.
            All your hunger and iq links are old world. Welcome to 2016.
            A nation like China which cannot feed it’s citizens is talking about iq.lol.

          • Jing Wei

            india undernourishment is about 5x as high as china, link below from 2015 from a neutral third party source, lol, low iq indian indeed.

            http://qz.com/404758/once-near-equals-china-and-india-have-radically-diverged-in-the-past-two-decades/

            even most malnourished chinese are chinese living bordering India which look like and with iq like indian anyway, lol.

            The Chinese science noble prize 9 vs Indian 5
            chinese nobel literature 2 vs. indian 1.

            hahahahhaha, lol..

          • phead128

            GMAT score is for business school. Yet does India excel in business? China GDP is so much higher than India.

          • Aron Deon

            Jing Wei: Your malnorishment data shows “children mal-nourishment”. i am showing total mal-nourishment.

          • Jimmy Smith

            There is no south asian race, Indians are a Caucasian race from gene studies and have skulls of Caucasian people. Their smartest as you can see in America can compete with the world. Asians are known copycats and Indians generally have higher verbal iq than east asians. All spelling bee champions in America are Indian children.

          • phead128

            Indians have higher verbal IQ in ENGLISH because they were British colony for 400 years. Plus, only the creme of the crop from India enter the US on H1B for immigration, so you have NATIVE English speakers (former colonial subjects) with a selective bias towards the best of the best. You are comparing apples to oranges.

          • Jing Wei

            spelling bee? lol, the rote memorization contest and only in English, which is Indian official language anyway. Try win something that’s not Indian official language which is spoken by 1.2 billion Indian, and I’ll be impressed. Chinese has more Nobel prize winners, astronomically more math, physics and chemistry Olympiad prizes. The under-achivement of Indian isn’t surprising, Indian can’t even copy anything. Indian is neither known as innovators or imitators, right on par with sub-saharan africans.

          • Deadmau5 Patton

            dravidians aren’t really caucasian. they’re close to australian abos.

            “Their smartest as you can see in America can compete with the world.”
            you’re arguing against yourself here. if you cherry pick only the very top from any society(especially of 1 billion people) you’ll get some smart folks.

            the point isn’t whether or not any smart indians exist. it’s whether or not indians as a whole are competitive. they’re not. not at all. decades of independence and no toilets should tell you something.

        • phead128

          Equatorial Guinea is a bad example because it’s too small of population. High GDP per capita is easier in small countries.

          China and India are the only countries with similar population. Both have ~1.2 billion people

          China and India had the same GDP per capita level in the 1950s and 1960s, but China accelerated ahead of India in terms of GDP per capita.

          So India cannot compete with China economically despite being the same population level and same level of GDP per capita in 1950’s

          This indicates Chinese IQ cannot be inferior to Indian IQ, because both have the same time to grow with the same demographic population.

          Cherry picking expat population, immigrant population, etc… is just making a pathetic attempt at argument.

          • Aron Deon

            China vs India is also a bad example. China is 3x bigger in size and 3x higher natural resources. As natural resources give manufacturing power, it can create wealth.

            Having said that, higher GDP is not easier in small countries. And is a baseless argument.

            Indian GDP is at Chinese level of 2006. And throughout history of mankind, India obtained a higher GDP despite with much much lower population. So, historic data is in our favors.

            Chinese in India are shoe makers while Indians in China earn way above locals. Chinese IQ cannot be higher than India by “half standard deviation” as maths does not fit in.

          • phead128

            Oil is too small to account for $9 trillion difference in GDP between China and India.

            Chinese oil is only worth 10% of GDP, so majority of economic difference is not due to energy but economic planning and intelligence of Chinese.

            Look at Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese who have no resources but higher GDP.

            Saudi Arabi is a bad example because they are worlds largest owner and exporter, China has a tiny oil reserve and not exporter.

            Chinese who migrate to India are from extremely poor areas of China who could not migrate to richer Southeast Asia or East Asia. They are not representative of average Chinese. Indians who migrate to China are from richer area because they can afford the means of travel to richer country so they are above average than average Indian.

          • Aron Deon

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indians_in_Hong_Kong
            “Meanwhile, other Indian communities such as Marwaris and Tamil Muslims came to Hong Kong for trading.”
            If you think Muslims in India are above average Indian (those who migrated to hong kong), then I would like you to learn more about Indian iq.

          • Jing Wei

            Indians are flooding Hong Kong and Singapore after 1990s. If even low IQ Indians are making more than high IQ indians in India, what does that tell you? Indian can’t create any first class first tier cities and countries, to date, there hasn’t been any Indian, both native and expats, can match what chinese have done. High IQ countries all become successful in their own countries, Indian have no such ability, they have to move to chinese/east asian/white societies to even do anything. Indians do well? No, second generation and more Indians in China are street vendors who are at the bottom of societies in China.

          • Yogeshwar Patil

            Would you mind to take just a little glance at the Chinese history? You would find that most of the machinery which you have evolved is based on the models and machines that were developed by Indian monks. Come-on guys we have very common culture and we had very friendly relationship in the historical past. Why do we have to fight to prove the superior ones in ourselves. And as you say about Indians defecation on the land I think you should give a visit to India. You will find that there’s no such practice prevailing. And as to talk about the GDP if the untold black money of both the countries are revealed you will find that the GDP of India will jump higher to that of China, but it is true that it cannot be considered. Human intelligence neither depends on GDP nor the average IQ of the country. So we have individuals with *best* IQ and countries with *highest *.Hope you understand the difference.

          • Aron Deon

            Any proof for your claim that Chinese in India are poor kind of Chinese. I don’t want opinions.

          • phead128

            Rich and smart Chinese immigrate to better locations than shitty India. Those worse of the worse Chinese that have nowhere else to go move to India.

          • Aron Deon

            http://www.livemint.com/Politics/VhMy2MGaVx1TEatRsQpnON/Chinese-immigrants–A-shrinking-community.html

            “Most of these settlers came from Canton (or Guangdong), while people belonging to the Hubei community, who were dentists by profession, came from the eponymous neighbouring province.”

          • phead128

            Holy shit there is like 4,000 Chinese Indians how the fuck do u generalize based on 4,000 people hahaha

          • phead128

            Malnourishment of Indian brain can cause extreme delusions.

            Average Indian defecate openly in streets and eats with their hands, like savage barbarians.

          • Aron Deon

            Yeah phead (pig head). That’s why I asked your people to send their top 10 university grads. We need more toilet makers and toilet cleaners. The first bunch of chinkeys coming across the mountains have proven that they are incapable in any generation. And even our people have gone to hong kong and confirmed that your people are incapable (check income of Indians in Hong Kong, lol). So start sending tsinghua graduates, your Terrence Taos, xi jinpig as we need more toilet makers to remove open defecation.

          • Jing Wei

            lol, building toilets for indian? hahahahhaha. Low iq people like Indians don’t know how to use toilets, don’t you get it? toilets are for high IQ people like chinese, low IQ indian don’t deserve and don’t know how to use toilets, that’s right, that’s why low iq indians are pooping in the open, hahahaha.

          • Jing Wei

            chinese population decreased from 20,000 to 4,000?
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_community_in_India

            lol. meaning the smarter chinese in India immigrated out to other high iq countries, leaving 4000 low iq chinese stuck in India, because those 4000 low iq chinese can only survive in India due to India’s low IQ but they would not survive in East Asia or other western countries. Same trend can be seen with Indian in general as well. Best Indian can only move to Chinese/white created societies working for chinese/white created companies, leaving 99.9999% of low iq 82 indians back in India as these people will not survive in high IQ countries such as Singapore, Hong Kong and US.

          • Jimmy Smith

            They’re more Indian CEOs in Silicon Valley than East Asian. Also India’s Space Program has reached mars before Asian people. I’ve seen Indians at management positions more than Asian people in western nations.

          • phead128

            That’s because India’s official language is English, so of course Indians will excel in English-speaking countries. If East Asia was colonized/conquered by British, they would excel in English speaking countries as well as migrants.

          • Jing Wei

            how does that disprove Chinese started more high profile companies than the Indians? and the fact that Chinese has 6x more unicorn startups than the Indians? Indian are only successful at climbing companies started by whites and only at English countries, yes, having everyone speaking English in India helps.

      • Jimmy Smith

        Pakistanis are not even same genetically to bengalis. They even look different in features. We are an Aryan Caucasian race and even Hitler knew this which is why he studied sources from the Rig Veda while Chinese are seen as plate face, toothless, d/ckless, no creativity people. You’re natural copycats and even their military marches look like ant colonies walking. Pakistanis have killed the Russians, British, Greeks, Turks, Arabs, Mongols. You losers can never win a war to save your life.